Amid Falling Revenues, Some Cities Turn to the Property Tax
By Liz Farmer, December 10, 2020
SHARE
As most major cities grapple with lost revenue due to the pandemic, some are turning toward the property tax as a way of filling the gap. Perhaps nowhere has this decision been more controversial than in Nashville, where the largest tax increase in the city’s history has already survived one attempt to overturn it.
Like other cities that rely on tourism, Nashville has suffered in the wake of the pandemic—most notably in entertainment and retail tax revenue. More than half of the city’s estimated $280 million in reduced revenue for the fiscal year that started July 1 is due to the sales tax. The city finance department attributes nearly all the lower-than-expected revenue to COVID-19, but a tornado that ripped through the area earlier this year also played a role.
Deputy Finance Director Mary Jo Wiggins said that Nashville’s economy makes it “subject to a higher volatility in our activity taxes.” Meanwhile, the metro region’s property tax rates had been historically low in recent years. “Increasing the property tax rate in fiscal 2021 provides greater stability in our tax revenue base,” she said.
Nashville isn’t the only place trying to lean more on the stability of the property tax in the recession. Houston this year used an exemption for declared disasters—in this case, COVID-19—to set a tax rate that would increase property tax revenue by more than the state’s limit of 3.5 percent per year.
And in Chicago, the council recently approved Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s proposed property tax increase (among other revenue-raising remedies) to plug a $1.2 billion projected budget deficit. The legislation also includes a plan to raise property taxes each year with inflation, tying it to the consumer price index.
All told, most cities are bracing for revenue shortfalls between 5 and 9 percent, according to research by Andrew Reschovsky, professor emeritus of public affairs and applied economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a former Lincoln Institute fellow. Reschovsky estimates the total revenue loss across all cities at $165 billion.
Lincoln Senior Fellow Joan Youngman notes that the property tax tends to be a more stable source of local revenue, for several reasons. Real property is a long-term investment, and in a downturn its values are generally not as volatile as retail sales or income. Local governments often have some ability to adjust the tax rate in response to changes in the tax base, and a multiyear assessment cycle can allow officials time to anticipate and respond to shortfalls.
“Revenue from tourism, entertainment, and travel can be subject to much more immediate and dramatic declines,” Youngman said. “That is why a mix of revenue sources on different cycles can be very helpful.”
Still, the pandemic-driven recession has created some unusual revenue scenarios and the property tax is no exception. Assessors in New Orleans and in Cook County, home to Chicago, have taken the unusual step of reassessing properties ahead of schedule to account for business losses from the pandemic. In New Orleans, Assessor Erroll Williams made across-the-board cuts in 2021 assessments for hotels, restaurants, and other commercial properties by as much as 57 percent. And in Cook County, Assessor Fritz Kaegi is planning to reevaluate every property in the county, a move that is also expected to lower tax bills for commercial properties.
Back in Nashville, the circumstances around the consolidated city-county Metro government’s property tax increase were also unusual. The Metro council approved increasing the rate by 34 percent—a large jump by any standard but particularly for a region with a low-tax culture.
But the rate increase came on the heels of one of the lowest property tax rates in decades. Moreover, Nashville residents already paid some of the lowest property taxes in a state that has among the nation’s lowest effective rates. Tennesseans on average pay less than $900 a year in property taxes, compared with more than $1,600 nationwide, according to the Lincoln Institute’s state-by-state property tax database tool.
Bill Purcell, mayor of Nashville from 1999–2007, said the city erred when it did not take advantage of an opportunity to increase revenue after its last four-year reappraisal in 2017, which recorded soaring property values. State law does not allow revenues to rise automatically when the property values increase. After a general reappraisal, counties and municipalities must advertise intent in the newspaper and hold a public hearing before they adopt a resolution or ordinance establishing a tax rate that would generate greater overall tax revenues than were billed in the year before the reappraisal. Nashville did not take this step after the 2017 reappraisal, and instead reduced the tax rate by 30 percent to keep collections level.
Stagnating the city’s largest revenue stream created budget pressure and lawmakers resorted to one-time measures to fix budgets. By 2019, Comptroller Justin Wilson began warning the city of a state takeover unless it could balance its budget.
“The Great Recession had long passed, employees had been promised raises, the city was growing substantially, and there was no adjustment of revenue to meet those needs,” said Purcell, adding that the property tax increase was a politically uncomfortable but necessary move.
Nashville’s new rate is $4.221 per $100 of assessed value—in line with its 25-year average. And because that rate is only applied to a small portion of the assessed value, it remains one of the lowest effective rates (0.67 percent) among Tennessee’s largest cities and counties.
“It is extremely difficult to raise taxes during a crisis,” said Youngman. “This shows the importance of continual adjustments to keep values and collections current, with appropriate relief measures targeted to taxpayers in need.”
Liz Farmer is a fiscal policy expert and journalist whose areas of expertise include budgets, fiscal distress, and tax policy. She is currently a research fellow at the Rockefeller Institute’s Future of Labor Research Center.
Photograph: Nashville, Tennessee, skyline. Credit: Michael Warren/Getty Images.
El curso aborda la salud fiscal municipal, la cual se deriva de la armonía entre la producción de ingresos, su apropiación y su utilización para el beneficio de la comunidad, y que, dada su importancia, debe ser prevista, medida y monitoreada continuamente. Se analiza el potencial de las fuentes de financiamiento, las asociaciones público-privadas, la capacidad de endeudamiento municipal y, especialmente, los beneficios de los instrumentos con base en el suelo como fuentes de financiamiento propias y sus efectos para la construcción de ciudades más justas, sostenibles y resilientes. También se plantea la necesidad de que los gobiernos establezcan reservas financieras para “días lluviosos”, que ocurren típicamente en periodos de recesión económica.
Relevancia
Las ciudades latinoamericanas se caracterizan por déficits en inversiones en obras y servicios públicos, que resultan en desigualdades en el acceso a recursos y oportunidades económicas y sociales. Las comunidades fiscalmente saludables tienen la capacidad de disminuir esos déficits y, por ende, combatir las inequidades y la pobreza que conllevan. La crisis financiera sin precedentes causada por la pandemia de COVID-19 ha agravado las desigualdades de la región, así como el estrés financiero y el riesgo de insolvencia del sector público, lo que incluso podría afectar la provisión de servicios básicos. El momento requiere que los gobiernos municipales evalúen su situación actual e implementen medidas de reestructuración fiscal para incluir mecanismos de gestión más progresistas, que permitan mantener la salud fiscal en el largo plazo.
Inequality, Infrastructure, Land Value Taxation, Land-Based Tax, Local Government, Planning, Poverty, Property Taxation, Public Finance, Tax Reform, Taxation, Valuation, Value Capture, Value-Based Taxes
Graduate Student Fellowships
2021 C. Lowell Harriss Dissertation Fellowship Program
The Lincoln Institute's C. Lowell Harriss Dissertation Fellowship Program assists PhD students, primarily at U.S. universities, whose research complements the Institute's interests in land and tax policy. The program provides an important link between the Institute's educational mission and its research objectives by supporting scholars early in their careers.
Webinar: Making Necessary Budget Cuts with an Eye to Equity and Resilience
November 18, 2020 | 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
Free, offered in English
SHARE
Watch the Recording
As the COVID-19 crisis has significantly slowed economic movement in most of the United States, cities across the country are bracing for major fiscal shortfalls. Additionally, city leaders must confront the high level of uncertainty over what course the coronavirus pandemic will take and for how long. In light of these factors, municipal budget cuts are all but inevitable. The situation is especially difficult for legacy cities, which were either already struggling economically or whose economies had just turned the corner.
And while making budget cuts is never easy, they can be particularly fraught during a crisis. The cuts that may be easiest to make for municipal government leaders may end up disproportionately impacting the city’s most vulnerable residents – or may make it more difficult for the city to start rebuilding when the crisis has passed. This webinar provides local leaders with tools to avoid falling into those traps by highlighting established best practices and exploring community engagement strategies for identifying resident budget priorities.
With these tools in hand, legacy city leaders will be able to make necessary cuts to their budgets in such a way that they will be well-positioned to continue their revitalization agendas that were interrupted by the pandemic. They will also build resident buy-in and trust as they utilize community engagement to make sure budget cuts are made in a way that residents find the least harmful.
This webinar is presented by the Legacy Cities Initiative at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Speakers
Shayne Kavanagh, Senior Manager of Research, Government Finance Officers Association
Mary Bunting, City Manager, City of Hampton, Virginia