Topic: City and Regional Planning

Consortium for Scenario Planning 2021 Conference

January 13, 2021 - January 15, 2021

Offered in English

The fourth annual Consortium for Scenario Planning Conference went digital in January 2021! With 150 attendees, this cutting-edge event featured interactive presentations by the Wasatch Front Regional Council and dozens of practitioners, consultants, and academics who use scenarios to develop more equitable and inclusive places, address economic and environmental challenges, respond to infrastructural needs, and more. 

Program highlights include: 

  • learning about the evolution of scenario planning in Salt Lake City, including a virtual tour of the region from WFRC; 
  • virtual networking opportunities; 
  • facilitated interactive group sessions; 
  • panel discussions on equity and low-growth issues in scenario planning with top researchers;
  • “unconference” programming developed by conference attendees; and
  •  13.75 APA certification maintenance credits available.

The conference is summarized in the article Annual Conference Addresses Equity, Climate Resilience, COVID-19, and More by Emma Zehner.

The Wasatch Front Regional Council led conference attendees on two virtual tours of local projects that the region’s scenario planning work enabled.

 

To start planning your experience, visit the conference platform. You can also download the conference agenda and speaker bios.

For more information, or to enquire about sponsorship opportunities, contact Heather Hannon, Scenario Planning Manager, at hhannon@lincolninst.edu


Details

Date
January 13, 2021 - January 15, 2021
Language
English

Keywords

Disaster Recovery, Inequality, Land Use, Land Use Planning, Local Government, Mapping, Planning, Resilience, Scenario Planning, Smart Growth, Sustainable Development, Transportation

Human Ecology

Design with Nature Now and the Pandemic
By Frederick Steiner, August 18, 2020

 

Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared on the Columbia University Press blog.

The American botanist Paul Sears called ecology “the subversive science.” Once we start to see the interconnections all around, our view of everything in the world changes. We begin to understand, and cannot avoid seeing, Aldo Leopold’s “wounds of the world,” the many deleterious effects than humanity has had on Planet Earth.

As the coronavirus was just beginning its deadly march across the United States, the 50th anniversary of Earth Day was celebrated here and abroad. Pioneers in environmentalism, like Sears and Leopold and Rachel Carson and Lady Bird Johnson, were honored. Carson, of course, gave us Silent Spring, her remarkable account of other interconnections that proved deadly. Soon after the arrival of the pandemic in the U.S., someone pondered publicly if we were living in “a silent spring.” But living in quarantine, I, like so many others, realized I was seeing, hearing, and smelling nature more intently. The noises of the city had changed but the city was hardly silent. As Toni Morrison observed, “at some point in life, the world’s beauty becomes enough.”

At my first Earth Day, the one 50 years ago, I first encountered the work of Carson and Leopold along with Ian McHarg, who had just published his manifesto Design with Nature. McHarg’s basic premise was that we should use ecology, the subversive science, as the foundation for design and planning. His influence was substantial but incomplete. To recognize the golden anniversary of the manifesto, and not only celebrate but extend his achievement, we published Design with Nature Now.

In editing the book, Richard Weller, Karen M’Closkey, Billy Fleming, and I emphasized the relevance of McHarg’s ideas for today. We invited people who knew him personally to reflect on his legacy and then collected twenty-five 21st-Century projects from around the world that exemplify “design with nature now.” The projects are organized around five themes. “Big Wilds” includes large-scale conservation endeavors, such as the Yellowstone to Yukon Initiative in North America and Africa’s continent-spanning Great Green Wall. “Urban Futures” features bold growth management programs, such as those for Oregon’s Willamette River Valley and the State of Utah. “Rising Tides” surveys adaptation and mitigation projects that take on sea-level changes as a result of global warming, such as proposals for New York City and the North Sea. “Fresh Waters” addresses ensuring safe drinking water for the planet’s growing population, such as plans for the Great Lakes and a wetland park in China. “Toxic Lands” considers how to transform highly polluted sites into useful areas for people and wildlife, with examples from the Ruhr Valley in Germany and London’s Olympic Park in London.

Large-scale landscape protection, metropolitan regional planning, coastline conservation, water quality management, and restoring polluted lands call on humans to adapt to change and plot better futures, and this work is all the more urgent as we face a warming planet. We humans are a resilient species, so the examples in Design with Nature Now are largely success stories. Perhaps now, more than ever, we need hopeful examples of design and planning.

As is now painfully evident, the coronavirus spreads largely through human contact; it takes advantage of our connectedness, our human ecology. It has laid bare many wounds in the world, as Leopold would say, from vulnerabilities associated with race, age, and poverty to inadequacies in our political leadership (hence the failure to act responsibly despite guidance from science). But design is an optimistic pursuit grounded in the belief we can do better, and ecology offers a framework for understanding natural and cultural systems. We need to be guided in our actions by a deep understanding of these systems. We have learned, and are continuing to learn, a lot from this pandemic. We should reflect on the wisdom we have gained from this experience and put it to productive use.

 


 

Frederick Steiner is dean and Paley Professor for the University of Pennsylvania Stuart Weitzman School of Design.

Photograph: Repurposing industrial ruins, Emscher Landscape Park in Ruhr Valley, Germany, features a green corridor and pedestrian pathways and spans 177 square miles and 20 municipalities. The evolving park reflects regional planners’ years of work connecting existing green spaces to reinvigorate a landscape formerly polluted by decades of coal mining and steel manufacturing. This project was featured in Design with Nature NowCredit: Emscher Landscape Park. Landscape Park Duisburg Nord. Photo © Michael Schwarze-Rodrian, Essen. 

Course

Desarrollo Urbano Orientado a Transporte (DOT): Aspectos críticos e implementación en América Latina

October 19, 2020 - November 20, 2020

Online

Free, offered in Spanish


Descripción

Este curso ofrece una introducción a la relación entre el transporte, la movilidad y los usos del suelo, y profundiza en el concepto de Desarrollo Urbano Orientado al Transporte (DOT) con énfasis en la movilidad sostenible. Se aborda la relación de este concepto con una serie de instrumentos de planificación y gestión urbana asociados a las inversiones en transporte masivo e infraestructura de transporte no motorizado, especialmente con la idea de captura de valor y los instrumentos de financiación del desarrollo urbano. Se discuten las etapas de formulación y evaluación de propuestas DOT, los impactos de las inversiones en transporte sobre el desarrollo y casos emblemáticos de DOT a nivel global.

Relevancia

Actualmente, las ciudades de América Latina y el Caribe realizan importantes inversiones en sistemas de transporte masivo, las que pretenden responder a los retos de un crecimiento urbano en rápida expansión y que incentiva el uso de vehículos motorizados privados. El concepto de Desarrollo Urbano Orientado al Transporte (DOT) surge como una alternativa frente a este crecimiento urbano de baja densidad y con baja demanda de los sistemas de transporte público, y busca promover formas urbanas compactas en áreas servidas por transporte masivo, la infraestructura para transporte no motorizado, la mezcla de usos del suelo para reducir la necesidad de viajes largos, y el mejoramiento del espacio público amigable para los peatones.

Bajar la convocatoria


Details

Date
October 19, 2020 - November 20, 2020
Application Period
August 18, 2020 - September 10, 2020
Selection Notification Date
September 25, 2020 at 6:00 PM
Location
Online
Language
Spanish
Cost
Free
Registration Fee
Free
Educational Credit Type
Lincoln Institute certificate

Keywords

BRT, Cadastre, Climate Mitigation, Development, Economic Development, Housing, Infrastructure, Land Use Planning, Planning, Smart Growth, Transport Oriented Development, Transportation, Urban Development, Value Capture, Zoning

Uncertain Futures

Lincoln Institute Announce Winners of RFP Focused on Equity and Low-Growth Scenarios
By Emma Zehner, July 29, 2020

 

In the coming year, MN350, a Minnesota-based climate justice organization, will work with the city of Bemidji, nonprofit groups, residents, and three tribal nations—Leech Lake, Red Lake, and White Earth—to explore what an equitable transition away from fossil fuels could look like. The scenario planning project aims to uncover lessons applicable to other U.S. cities located in proximity to tribal nations and is one of eight projects selected for support by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy to develop new applications of scenario planning. The projects will focus on two major challenges: stagnant or declining population, and spatial inequity.

Each recipient will receive $10,000 to conduct original research and develop new methods for applying scenario planning, a practice through which communities plan for uncertainty by exploring multiple plausible futures. Completed projects will range from a working paper to case studies to a guidebook for practitioners to model decline or low-growth scenarios.

In addition to the MN350 planning initiative, the Lincoln Institute will support the following projects:

  • In Boston, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council will undertake a literature review, stakeholder engagement, and modeling exercise to create a framework for forecasting the racial makeup of particular neighborhoods, with no ‘correct’ forecast, but a range of segregation scenarios against which policies can be tested.
  • Cascadia Partners will research equitable technologies for scenario planning, with a particular focus on public engagement in a post-pandemic world.
  • Center for a New Economy will produce a working paper focused on San Juan, Puerto Rico, with new data that practitioners can use to determine the impact of disasters on socioeconomic segregation, urban decay, housing affordability, gentrification, and residential displacement. The center will share the research through workshops and webinars with practitioners and decision makers at FEMA, HUD, the Puerto Rico Department of Housing, and municipal governments.
  • Officials in Vancouver will write a case study on how they are deploying scenario planning with an equity lens and how they are altering the process to respond to the COVID-19 crisis.
  • The City of Youngstown, Ohio is using scenario planning to explore how their comprehensive plan for land use over the long-term might hold up amid various population trends in the future.
  • Arnab Chakraborty, professor of urban and regional planning at the University of Illinois, will create a toolkit for communities undertaking scenario planning in low-growth geographies.
  • Ian Varley, planning manager at City Explained, will develop case studies and a guidebook, adapting the CommunityViz software as a demonstration tool to model low-growth geographies.

The projects are supported by the Lincoln Institute’s Consortium for Scenario Planning and Legacy Cities Initiative. The Consortium aims to improve the practice of scenario planning and broaden its use across disciplines in communities of all sizes through research, peer-to-peer learning, training, and technical assistance. The Legacy Cities Initiative, a new program of the Lincoln Institute, seeks to promote sustainable and equitable revitalization of post-industrial cities by convening networks, facilitating the exchange of ideas and practices, and researching and advancing new policy approaches.

Together, these projects will help to broaden the applicability of scenario planning, an increasingly popular tool in urban planning, said Heather Sauceda Hannon, the institute’s scenario planning manager.

“Scenario planning is a mechanism for purposeful decision-making and is often used to measure impacts of transportation and land use through a variety of metrics,” said Hannon. “The social implications of decision-making and planning are often more difficult to identify and measure. However, scenario planning can be an effective framework through which planners can explore the potential impacts of decisions on historically marginalized communities. In addition, scenario planning has historically been used with high-growth projections and we want to show how it can be used for areas that have seen decline or low growth.”

The Lincoln Institute is also exploring how practitioners can make the process of scenario planning itself more equitable by, for example, undertaking activities to reach historically underrepresented populations, according to Jessie Grogan, associate director of reduced poverty and spatial inequality for the institute and leader of the institute’s Legacy Cities Initiative.

 


 

Emma Zehner is communications and publications editor at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Photograph creditJ. Stephen Conn/Flickr.