Topic: City and Regional Planning

Growth and Grit in Cleveland: A Conversation with Mayor Justin Bibb

August 4, 2026

By Anthony Flint, August 4, 2026

Of all the postindustrial cities in the US and around the world, Cleveland, Ohio, has perhaps had the most ups and downs, oscillating between decline and revival. The city has come a long way since the polluted Cuyahoga River caught fire in 1969, and has been a pioneer in revitalizing its industrial waterfront. Now the city has a chance to start over once again, with the departure of the Cleveland Browns opening up more than 50 acres of prime lakefront land currently anchored by the football stadium, which will be demolished.

The potential for a transformational redevelopment is not lost on Justin Bibb, who was reelected last November to a second term as mayor of Cleveland—and is the latest municipal chief executive to be featured in the Lincoln Institute’s Mayor’s Desk series.

“We have a historic opportunity to maximize Cleveland’s lakefront for once and for all,” Bibb said in a wide-ranging interview recorded for the Land Matters podcast. “We’ve done some things in piecemeal, but we’ve never had a bold, unified vision for really reinvigorating what I call America’s North Coast.”

Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb speaks with Anthony Flint from his office at City Hall. Credit: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

 

The stadium site overhaul, adjacent to the popular Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, will be done in coordination with a massive redevelopment of the now largely industrial Cuyahoga River waterfront. “We want this to be a model for America on how a legacy American city like Cleveland can be a two-waterfront city,” Bibb said.

The waterfront plans have been center stage recently, but Bibb has also been active in trying to assist struggling neighborhoods outside of downtown, including the Midline business district and greenway, which aims to make better use of 350 acres of vacant and under-utilized land.

“We are the largest landowner in the city, and we have thousands … of vacant lots that we have failed to put into productive use,” Bibb said. Under the Site Readiness for Good Jobs Fund, the city is taking stock of its industrial past—and the pollution it created—and identifying contaminated sites for clean-up and a quick turnaround for new business seeking to locate in places like the city’s long-struggling East Side.

Cleveland is well positioned to usher in manufacturing that is “re-shoring” to the US, amid greater awareness of the importance of resilient supply chains, he said. “It’s important that cities activate these sites and attract these jobs of the future, and the present, to make sure that America’s industrial future is competitive long-term.”

“We have the land, we have the talent, and we have the strategy to compete in the global economy,” he said.

One of the new businesses to move into one of those empty industrial sites—a long-empty factory that once supplied ore unloaders for the local steel industry—has been especially promising, Bibb said:  MMY US, a producer of low-cost, factory-built modular homes.

“They’ll be bringing 150 good-paying jobs to the city, and they’re going to help us build, in six to eight weeks, new homes in Cleveland that are affordable and within reach for our residents,” he said. “Also, because of our location, we can be a net exporter of modular homes to Canada. We think this will be a game changer for Cleveland’s economy long-term.”

Members of the press listen as Mayor Bibb speaks at the Wellman-Seaver-Morgan Engineering Company building, a long-empty factory that will soon be occupied by a modular housing manufacturer. Credit: City of Cleveland.

 

Born and raised in the Mt. Pleasant neighborhood in Cleveland’s southeast side, Justin Bibb was reelected to a second term as mayor in November 2025. Previously he worked for President Barack Obama during the latter’s time in the US Senate, served as an education and economic policy advisor for Cuyahoga County, and held leadership roles at Gallup, KeyBank, and Urbanova, focusing on civic innovation and data-driven strategies to improve the quality of life in cities.  He earned a BA in urban studies from American University in 2009 and an MBA and JD from Case Western Reserve University in 2018.

The Lincoln Institute has special connections with the City of Cleveland. The organization’s founder, John C. Lincoln, was an inventor and entrepreneur there at the turn of the last century, and established the Lincoln Electric company, a major employer to this day. John Lincoln was interested in the ideas of the political economist Henry George, and heard his first speech by George in Cleveland, which famously had a Georgist mayor, Tom Johnson, in the first decade of the 1900s.

John Lincoln eventually moved to Phoenix as he launched all his philanthropic efforts, but the Lincoln family remained involved in many civic affairs. The Kathryn J. Lincoln Speaker Series, an educational deep dive focused on effective urban planning, inclusive community development, and investment in ethical leadership, was established last year at the City Club of Cleveland. That is named for Katie Lincoln, chair of the board of the Lincoln Institute, who is John C. Lincoln’s granddaughter.

In addition, Cleveland was the subject of a documentary film produced by the Lincoln Institute that scrutinizes the city’s various efforts to engineer an urban renaissance. Cleveland: Confronting Decline in an American City, part of the Making Sense of Place series, aired extensively on public television.

The “two waterfronts” of Cleveland: the downtown shoreline of Lake Erie and the snaking curves of the Cuyahoga River. Credit: © 2026 Google Maps, NOAA.

 

Listen to the discussion with Mayor Bibb here or subscribe to Land Matters on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you listen to podcasts.


Further Reading

Analysis: Cleveland Engages a New Lakefront Planning Team to See What’s Possible After Browns Leave | Ideastream Public Media

Our Governing Agenda for the Cleveland ERA | Substack

A Legacy of Innovation: How Leaders in Cleveland Reimagined and Rebuilt Their City After Decades of Decline | Land Lines

Making Sense of Place, Cleveland: Confronting Decline in an American City | Lincoln Institute documentary

Legacy Cities | Lincoln Institute Data & Tools


Anthony Flint is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, host of the Land Matters podcast, and a contributing editor of Land Lines


Transcript

[00:00:05] Anthony Flint: Welcome back to the Land Matters podcast. I’m your host, Anthony Flint. Of all the post-industrial cities in the US and around the world, Cleveland, Ohio, has perhaps had the most ups and downs, oscillating between decline and revival. The city’s come a long way since those dark days of the Cuyahoga River catching fire, and it has been a pioneer in revitalizing its industrial waterfront, led by the establishment of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Now Cleveland has another chance to re-envision the lakefront and make better connections with the rest of the city, all the while addressing persistent issues of equity and uneven economic opportunity in many neighborhoods that are still struggling.

To talk about all this, we have the honor of having a special guest on the Land Matters podcast, the mayor of Cleveland, Justin Bibb. He’s the latest municipal chief executive to be interviewed as part of our Mayor’s Desk series — Conversations With Local Leaders Solving Global Problems. We’ve caught up with many inventive mayors in this series, but Mayor Bibb has been getting a lot of attention for his creativity and policy innovation and has been described politically as quite a rising star.

Some quick background. Before becoming mayor, he worked for President Barack Obama during his time in the US Senate. Served as an education and economic policy advisor for Cuyahoga County and also held leadership roles at Gallup, KeyBank, and Urbanova, focusing on civic innovation and data-driven strategies. A native of the Mount Pleasant neighborhood in Cleveland’s Southeast Side, he’s a proud graduate of American University with a degree in urban studies and has also pursued advanced studies in social policy and economics at the London School of Economics and earned both a MBA and a law degree at Case Western Reserve University.

Before we begin our conversation, just an additional quick note about the many connections that have linked Cleveland and the Lincoln Institute. Our founder, John C. Lincoln, was an inventor and entrepreneur there at the turn of the last century and established the Lincoln Electric Company, which is there to this day. John Lincoln was interested in the ideas of the political economist Henry George and heard his first speech by Henry George right there in Cleveland, which famously had its fully Georgist mayor, Tom Johnson.

John Lincoln eventually moved to Phoenix as he launched all his philanthropic efforts, but the Lincoln family remained involved in many civic affairs. Twenty years ago, the Lincoln Institute also premiered the Making Sense of Place documentary series with a feature-length film looking at Cleveland’s efforts to engineer a renaissance to bounce back from hard times. We’ve also stayed closely connected with the City Club of Cleveland and its great tradition of civic engagement and its lecture series, which now includes the Kathryn J. Lincoln Speaker Series, an educational deep dive focused on effective urban planning, inclusive community development, and investment in ethical leadership.That’s named for Katie Lincoln, chair of the board of the Lincoln Institute, who is John C. Lincoln’s granddaughter.

So our fates are in some ways interwoven. The bottom line is we continue to be interested in what’s happening in Cleveland, and that’s why we’re so grateful for this opportunity. Mayor Justin Bibb, thank you for joining the conversation at Land Matters, and for being part of our Mayor’s Desk interview series.

[00:03:46] Mayor Justin Bibb: Thanks for having me, Anthony.

[00:03:47] Anthony Flint: Well, as I mentioned, decades ago, Cleveland was really a pioneer in redeveloping its waterfront. I think the most recognizable project is the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, but also the Browns Stadium. Now the Browns are moving to the suburbs. Tell us about that and how will the new redevelopment that’s envisioned be different?

[00:04:08] Mayor Justin Bibb: Well, we fought the good fight to keep the Browns playing good or bad football on our lakefront, but the political winds were not in our favor, and now we have a historic opportunity to maximize Cleveland’s lakefront for once and for all. I’ve joked often since I became mayor four years ago that every mayor since Tom Johnson, for the last 100-plus years has had a lakefront plan in Cleveland. We’ve done some things in piecemeal, but we’ve never had a bold, unified vision for really reinvigorating what I call America’s North Coast.

This next chapter is really about making the lakefront a destination for residents, a destination for tourists. Really, we want this to be a model for America on how a legacy American city like Cleveland can be a two-waterfront city. Not only are we redeveloping the 50-acre site where the Browns Stadium currently sits, we’re also undergoing a nearly $4 billion transformation of our riverfront, really led by the great partnership we have with Dan Gilbert and the Bedrock family of companies. That’s about a $5 billion effort to make Cleveland a dual waterfront city.

Excited about the progress that we’re making. We’ll break ground on the lakefront in the fourth quarter of next year. We already have broken ground, and construction is underway on our riverfront. Folks from around the world will be coming to Cleveland soon because we will be one of the best two-waterfront cities, not just in America, but around the globe in the relatively near future.

[00:05:38] Anthony Flint: When you say the two waterfronts, orient us a little bit. That’s the lakefront and the Cuyahoga River?

[00:05:45] Mayor Justin Bibb: Yes, that’s correct. Cleveland is so unique that we sit on two bodies of water – [Lake Erie and] the Cuyahoga River, which has a storied history in Cleveland and across the country. I sit in the office of the late, great Carl B. Stokes, who was the first Black man and the first Black mayor to lead a major American city. His photo is right behind me and on my chair here at City Hall.

I’m willing to bet when he ran for mayor in the mid-1960s, he didn’t run to be a climate mayor. At the time, industry was not doing right by its cities. They weren’t doing right by its waterways. Our river caught on fire. As a result of that, Carl B. Stokes confronted this crisis. After that crisis happened, he did a nationwide pollution tour, which helped create the Clean Water Act, which then led the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA, as we call it today.

Cleveland has a storied history, and 50 years later, our ability to clean up the Cuyahoga River is a model of resilience across the country, and now it’s seeing a nearly $4 billion investment right now through our partnership with Bedrock.

[00:06:48] Anthony Flint: Just pivoting here for a second, what’s your view on the use of government-owned land for creating things like permanently affordable housing, other improvements? You’ve got a fair amount of government-owned land there. What are the prospects for that?

[00:07:02] Mayor Justin Bibb: We are the largest landowner in the city, and we have thousands and thousands and thousands of vacant lots that we have failed to put into productive use. We’re really excited about the work we’re doing to put our assets to work in a more productive way. Currently right now, we are attracting a world-renowned global modular housing manufacturer, MMY. They’re bringing one of their manufacturing headquarters to Cleveland, going to create 150 good-paying jobs, and our new business district called the Midline, which is the largest redevelopment project in the city’s history, a 350-acre site.

That’s one example of the work we’re doing through our site readiness fund for good jobs, where we’re converting a thousand acres of brownfield vacant land, predominantly in the heart of Cleveland’s inner city, and making those sites shovel-ready to go. Not only is it good housing policy to really address our cities’ and our nation’s housing affordability crisis, it’s also a good industrial policy, because as the nation works to have more resilient supply chains, as we see these trends are re-shoring, take shape, it’s important that cities activate these sites and attract these jobs of the future and the present to make sure that America’s industrial future is competitive long-term.

[00:08:19] Anthony Flint: Following up on this idea of repurposing land — there are so many opportunities. Tell us a little bit more about the East Side neighborhoods and the use of different land-based financing to encourage redevelopment and repurposing.

[00:08:35] Mayor Justin Bibb: Yes, Cleveland’s East Side has a long, storied history. My grandparents came up here from the segregated South for jobs in the steel mills and jobs in the auto plants, as well as many immigrants from around the world, particularly from Eastern Europe, who came to Cleveland for those jobs, because Cleveland was a walk-to-work city, and a lot of those jobs were concentrated in Cleveland’s East Side.

For generations, that part of the city has not gotten its fair share of investment. One of the things that we’re doing is we’re using the same taxing tools that we’ve used to spur nearly $5 billion of investment on the waterfronts. We’re using those same tools to attract private investment to the East Side of Cleveland. We’re thinking about vacant parcels differently. We’re activating those vacant lots for shovel-ready job sites to attract good-paying jobs, to put the working class and the middle class back to work in Cleveland.

We’re also using those sites to really address our housing crisis. Particularly in the St. Clair-Superior neighborhood, we are deploying a new housing innovation district to really unlock brand new homeownership and new single-family homes for the future of the East Side of Cleveland.

[00:09:41] Anthony Flint: You mentioned the Site Readiness Initiative. I’m wondering, what have you learned from that experience, and any tips for other legacy cities or cities otherwise on this idea of looking at underutilized industrial land?

[00:09:57] Mayor Justin Bibb: This isn’t just about vacant land. It’s about talent. It’s about infrastructure. It’s about building a resilient manufacturing ecosystem that really builds on the strengths of Cleveland’s economy, so we’re really excited about this. We believe we can attract 2,500 good-paying jobs to the Midline. It costs about $100 million of capital to clean up. It’s 200 acres of vacant land that we’re transforming, and we’re putting about 1.5 million square feet of commercial space back to the market.

For any city to compete, you need two things: you need land, and you need talent. When I took office, we didn’t have any sites, 10 acres or more, to attract or retain companies in the city. Now we have the land, we have the talent, and we have the strategy to compete in the global economy.

[00:10:44] Anthony Flint: You mentioned there’s a modular homes manufacturer that is going into one site. That’s a pretty neat trick.

[00:10:51] Mayor Justin Bibb: Big deal. MMY is the first company to call the Midline home. As I said earlier, they’ll be bringing 150 good-paying jobs to the city, and they’re going to help us build, in six to eight weeks, new homes in Cleveland that are affordable and within reach for our residents. Also, because of our location and the Great Lakes and Lake Erie, we can be a net exporter of modular homes to Canada. We think this will be a game changer for Cleveland’s economy long-term.

[00:11:17] Anthony Flint: Finally, you’ve done a lot of work in climate and climate resilience, but do you think of Cleveland as a climate haven? If so, what needs to be done to take advantage of that kind of interest? Also, are you worried about gentrification?

[00:11:32] Mayor Justin Bibb: I absolutely believe that Cleveland is a climate haven. I believe our climate resilience as a city is second to none. We have access to fresh water. We have a temperate climate, four seasons actually in Cleveland. Although we were, like many cities in the US, exposed to the Canadian wildfires and the air quality, no real hurricanes, no wildfires in Cleveland. When you look at our coastal peer cities, Cleveland has a unique, I think, competitive advantage.

To protect it, number one, we need to make sure we have a resilient housing infrastructure, which is what we’re focused on. We need to make sure that we continue to have an economy that’s growing. We also need to make sure that when we think about climate change and think about this work around environmental justice, that is squarely focused on the cost of living crisis, and that’s our effort.

Now, gentrification means different things to different people. But we have a growth mindset in Cleveland. We need to grow the pie, but also support and uplift existing residents. Our economic philosophy is in all of the above approach to make Cleveland a city where the American dream is alive, within reach, and affordable. That’s the goal.

[00:12:39] Anthony Flint: Mayor Justin Bibb, thank you again for your time. It’s been a pleasure.

[00:12:42] Mayor Justin Bibb: Thanks for having me.

[00:12:43] Anthony Flint: Well, that’s a wrap on the Land Matters podcast. You can find extensive content about Cleveland and legacy cities on our website, that’s lincolninst.edu. Just navigate to the impact area called Land and Communities. You’ll also find the Making Sense of Place documentary series at the website, which includes recent updates on many of the initiatives we looked at 20 years ago. On social media, our handle is @landpolicy.

Please go ahead and rate, share, and subscribe to Land Matters, the podcast of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. For now, I’m Anthony Flint, signing off until next time.

[00:29:22] [END OF AUDIO]

Read full transcript
Land Wise
Blog Post

Meet the Author: Building Postcarbon Futures

By Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, August 5, 2026

Around the globe, people are transforming their social, ecological, and economic systems in response to the climate crisis. The recently published Building Postcarbon Futures: Land, Justice, and Energy Transitions guides readers through 29 of these exemplary works in a vibrantly illustrated atlas, followed by deep explorations of the issues by more than a dozen leading scholars on the front lines of the climate justice movement.

Don’t miss an opportunity to meet volume editor Billy Fleming, along with select contributing authors and special guests, at Building Postcarbon Futures events around the US in the next few months as they discuss what it will take to build and maintain a more just, regenerative world—and be sure to keep an eye on this space for additional events and event details.

SEPTEMBER 2026

September 9: Boulder, CO
Building Postcarbon Futures: Land, Justice, and Energy Transitions with Billy Fleming
CU Boulder Environmental Design Lecture Series
College of Communication, Media, Design, and Information
1060 18th Street, Boulder, CO 80309
12:00–1:00 p.m.

September 10: Boulder, CO
Book Talk and Community Conversation: Billy Fleming and Phaedra Pezzullo
Trident Booksellers and Cafe
940 Pearl St, Boulder, CO 80302
6:00–7:30 p.m.

September 17: Los Angeles, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Alissa Walker, and Jenny Jones
Presented by LA Urban Forum in conjunction with ASLA Conference
Terremoto Office Garden
3618 Pasadena Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90031
5:30–7:00 p.m.

September 23: NYC Climate Week/New York, NY
Architecture, Planning, and International Law: Building Postcarbon Futures
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, Keller Easterling, and Daniel Aldana Cohen
Center for Brooklyn History
128 Pierrepont St, Brooklyn, NY 11201
6:30–8:00 p.m.
RSVP required

September 29: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Akira Drake Rodriguez, and Kimberly Thomas
Temple University Tyler School of Art and Architecture
Atrium Gallery, 2001 N 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122
4:00–5:30 p.m.

OCTOBER 2026

October 6: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Nikil Saval
American Grammar Bookstore
2046 N Front St, Philadelphia, PA 19122
6:00–8:00 p.m.

October 15: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Special Guest
WRT
123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1450, Philadelphia, PA 19109
Time TBD

October 26: Ann Arbor, MI
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Shalanda Baker
Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan
Art and Architecture Building
2000 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069
11:30 a.m.–1:00 p.m.

Late October: Cambridge, MA
Watch for details soon!

NOVEMBER 2026

November 18: Miami, FL
Paul J. Cejas Lecture Series
Landscape Architecture + Environmental and Urban Design Department
Florida International University
11200 SW 8th ST, Paul Cejas Architecture Bldg, Miami, Florida 33199
5:00–6:30 p.m.

FEBRUARY 2027

February 22: Berkeley, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Daniel Aldana Cohen, and Danielle Rivera
UC Berkeley
230 Bauer Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720-1820
5:00–7:00 p.m.

February 23: San Francisco, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Special Guest
William Stout Architectural Books
804 Montgomery St, San Francisco, CA 94133
Time TBD

MARCH 2027

March 25: College Park, MD
University of Maryland National Center for Smart Growth
2027 Spring Colloquium Series
Anacostia Building, 1 Physics Ellipse Dr, College Park, MD 20740
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.

 


Lead image credit: Cristian Ordóñez.

President's Message

Nuevos dirigentes para un momento clave

Por Robert Puentes, July 21, 2026

Unas palabras de la presidente de la junta directiva del Instituto Lincoln, Kathryn J. Lincoln:

Cuando mi padre, David C. Lincoln, fundó el Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo en 1974, su propósito estaba claro. Al igual que mi abuelo antes que él, creía que fomentar una mejor comprensión de la economía urbana, los impuestos y el suelo “garantizaría que más personas tengan las mismas oportunidades, al margen del lugar que ocupan en el terreno de la vida”. Más de 50 años después, el Instituto Lincoln mantiene su compromiso con la meta de mejorar el acceso a las oportunidades a través de las políticas de suelo. En los primeros años de nuestra sexta década, no podría estar más feliz de que Robert Puentes tome las riendas como el sexto presidente.

Rob, un urbanista veterano que, en el último tiempo, se desempeñó como dirigente de Brookings Metro y el Eno Center for Transportation, ha dicho que el suelo es parte de su ADN. Comparto el sentimiento (no podría ser de otra manera, dadas mis raíces), y espero trabajar de cerca con Rob en esta nueva etapa dentro de la familia del Instituto Lincoln. En este, el primer Mensaje del presidente, comparte su perspectiva sobre por qué este es un momento fundamental para el Instituto Lincoln, las políticas de suelo y las comunidades de todo el mundo.


Es un honor para mí unirme al Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo como el nuevo presidente y director ejecutivo. La oportunidad de dirigir una institución con un legado tan distinguido en la mejora de la educación, la investigación y la aplicación de políticas de suelo llega en un momento fundamental para las comunidades de los Estados Unidos y todo el mundo. Se les está pidiendo a los dirigentes locales que hagan más con menos, y el papel del Instituto Lincoln como un recurso confiable y no partidista es más esencial que nunca.

Foto de Robert Puentes

A lo largo de mi carrera, he trabajado en la intersección del uso de suelo, la infraestructura y la urbanización metropolitana: donde las comunidades enfrentan sus desafíos más importantes. Desde dirigir el programa de Brookings Institution sobre ciudades y áreas metropolitanas hasta desempeñarme como presidente del Eno Center for Transportation, me he centrado en desarrollar soluciones basadas en datos y evidencia para resolver los problemas que priorizan los dirigentes locales: una mejor accesibilidad para todos los residentes, un clima más saludable, y una economía más fuerte y equitativa. Estas prioridades se alinean directamente con la misión del Instituto Lincoln de integrar las políticas de suelo con la justicia social, las oportunidades económicas y la sostenibilidad medioambiental.

Las políticas de suelo determinan cómo la gente vive su vida diaria: cómo van al trabajo, encuentran vivienda, acceden a servicios y se conectan entre sí. Determina la capacidad de pago de viviendas, el desarrollo económico, la salud medioambiental y la resiliencia ante el cambio climático. Como comisionado de planificación local en Virginia, vi de primera mano cómo la zonificación restrictiva perpetúa la segregación y limita las oportunidades, y cómo las decisiones fragmentadas sobre el uso de suelo profundizan la vulnerabilidad climática. Pero también vi lo que se vuelve posible cuando las comunidades capturan el valor del suelo y conectan las políticas de suelo con la inversión en infraestructura, las estrategias de vivienda y la planificación regional. Esta perspectiva integrada guiará mi liderazgo en el Instituto Lincoln, donde nuestro trabajo debe superar las divisiones tradicionales entre disciplinas y sectores: conectar a planificadores con profesionales del transporte y administradores del agua, a expertos en finanzas públicas con agencias de desarrollo, y a profesionales locales con responsables de formulación de políticas estatales y regionales, porque los desafíos actuales son demasiado complejos para abordarlos de forma aislada.

Al asumir esta función, preveo varias prioridades clave para impulsar el avance del instituto.

En primer lugar, debemos seguir fortaleciendo la base de evidencia para una política de suelo sólida. Esto implica producir investigaciones rigurosas y accesibles que ayuden a los profesionales a comprender qué funciona, por qué funciona y cómo adaptar los enfoques exitosos a sus contextos locales. El Instituto Lincoln siempre ha sido un referente en la generación de conocimiento, y construiremos sobre estos cimientos al participar directamente en nuevos debates sobre políticas, aquí y en el extranjero, donde nuestra experiencia puede aportar rigor e independencia a las conversaciones nacionales relevantes.

En segundo lugar, debemos expandir nuestro rol como conciliadores y conectores, mientras respondemos a la realidad de los profesionales. Las soluciones innovadoras surgen cuando se unen personas de diferentes contextos y sectores, y el Instituto Lincoln está en una posición única para crear espacios (físicos y virtuales) para profesionales, investigadores, responsables de formulación de políticas y líderes comunitarios a fin de desarrollar asociaciones duraderas.

En tercer lugar, debemos hacerle frente al análisis de la equidad. Con demasiada frecuencia, las políticas de suelo han sido una herramienta de exclusión y despojo. No podemos cambiar la historia, pero podemos asegurarnos de que las decisiones actuales sobre políticas de suelo creen oportunidades en lugar de perpetuar la desigualdad, un trabajo que recae cada vez más en los estados, las localidades y las instituciones no partidistas como el Instituto Lincoln. Esto implica centrar las experiencias y la experiencia de las comunidades marginadas por políticas de suelo anteriores, examinar los efectos distributivos de las propuestas de políticas y apoyar a los profesionales que trabajan para promover la equidad en sus comunidades.

En cuarto lugar, debemos tener una participación más directa con el cambio climático. Las decisiones sobre el uso de suelo son fundamentales tanto para la mitigación como para la adaptación, ya sea que eso signifique vincular los planes de desarrollo con la demanda de agua, permitir un crecimiento orientado al transporte público que reduzca las emisiones de los vehículos o implementar soluciones basadas en la naturaleza, en especial, en áreas vulnerables al clima. El Instituto Lincoln no solo debe ayudar a los profesionales a transitar esta complejidad, sino también contribuir a cubrir las deficiencias al brindar la investigación, las herramientas y las redes de pares que las comunidades necesitan para actuar con confianza.

En quinto lugar, debemos asegurarnos de que el campo se beneficie de nuestra asociación transformadora con Claremont Lincoln University. A través de los programas de grado de CLU y la iniciativa Lincoln Vibrant Communities, esta colaboración abre nuevas puertas para fortalecer el trabajo de los profesionales en el terreno. No solo ofrecemos información valiosa sobre la investigación: brindamos las habilidades, las credenciales y las redes necesarias para impulsar un cambio duradero. Y, a medida que evolucionen nuestras ofertas de educación (aprendizaje digital en expansión, asistencia técnica y aprendizaje entre pares), los profesionales contarán con recursos cada vez más relevantes, accesibles y de aplicación inmediata a su labor diaria.

Reconozco la ambición de esta agenda y asumo esta función con claridad sobre las oportunidades y los desafíos que se avecinan. Siento un profundo honor por la confianza que la Junta Directiva del Instituto Lincoln ha puesto en mí, y me comprometo a mantener los más altos estándares de ética, equidad y transparencia articulados por generaciones de la familia Lincoln en todos los aspectos de mi trabajo.

Estas cuestiones son muy personales para mí. Crecí en una familia de obreros y comprendo el valor que tiene el trabajo: un trabajo es una ruta fundamental para salir de la pobreza. Fui el primero de mi familia en asistir a la universidad y sé, de primera mano, lo transformadoras que pueden ser las oportunidades educativas de calidad. A lo largo de mi vida, he mantenido un profundo aprecio por el lugar y la enorme importancia de cómo se usa, grava y administra el suelo. Estas experiencias personales fundamentan mi convicción de que las políticas de suelo son demasiado importantes para dejarlas solo en manos de los especialistas. Afectan a todos; por eso, nuestro trabajo debe ser accesible, práctico y conectado con los desafíos reales que enfrentan las comunidades a diario. Me comprometo a garantizar que el Instituto Lincoln siga siendo un recurso confiable para investigadores y profesionales, una fuente vital de conocimiento para los responsables de la formulación de políticas y un catalizador para un cambio positivo en las comunidades de todo el mundo.

Estoy ansioso por trabajar con el talentoso personal del Instituto Lincoln y nuestra extensa red de colaboradores y profesionales en todo el país y el mundo. En conjunto, podemos impulsar políticas de suelo que construyan comunidades más inclusivas, sostenibles y prósperas para todos.


Robert Puentes es presidente y director ejecutivo del Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Land Wise
Blog Post
Three people walk along a trail. A rocky mountain obscures most of the sky behind them.

Sembrar agua, sembrar el futuro en las altas montañas del Perú

Por Melinda Lis Maldonado, July 15, 2026

La camioneta se detuvo y supe que era hora de bajar. Siguiendo el consejo del “guardián del agua” que acababa de conocer, abrí primero la puerta y esperé unos segundos. Respiré el aire denso de la montaña y bajé con cuidado. Apenas había caminado unos metros cuando sentí en el cuerpo el peso de más de 4.500 metros de altitud. Me detuve un momento, un poco mareada, esperando a que pasara el vértigo.

Nada de eso me impidió quedarme allí, de pie, contemplando el paisaje. Ante mí se extendían las montañas andinas del Perú, imponentes y silenciosas. Mientras observaba aquella escena, pensé que probablemente era el lugar más alto al que había llegado en mi vida, y me pregunté si el Instituto Lincoln habría llegado alguna vez tan alto…

Pero la altitud era apenas el comienzo de la historia.

Un pueblo a la base de una montaña verde.
El pueblo de San Pedro de Casta, a unos 3.000 metros sobre el nivel del mar, en la cuenca alta de Santa Eulalia. Fuente: Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Imaginar el futuro de una subcuenca

La visita a la montaña tuvo lugar el día anterior a un taller sobre resiliencia hídrica en la subcuenca de Santa Eulalia, muchos metros más abajo. El encuentro forma parte de un proceso que se ha venido desarrollando durante varios meses y que busca fortalecer la capacidad de distintos territorios de América Latina y el Caribe para imaginar y prepararse ante futuros inciertos relacionados con el agua.

La herramienta detrás de ese ejercicio es la planificación de escenarios exploratorios (XSP por su sigla en inglés): en lugar de apostar por un único futuro predecible o deseable, se propone navegar por una gama de futuros inciertos para luego regresar al presente y diseñar estrategias para enfrentarlos.

Santa Eulalia es uno de los cinco casos que conforman esta iniciativa regional, liderada por el Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo a través de su Consorcio para la Planificación de Escenarios y de su programa de suelo y agua, el Centro Babbitt para Políticas de Suelo y Agua. La implementación local estuvo a cargo de Aquafondo, el Fondo de Agua para Lima y Callao, una organización que promueve la seguridad hídrica mediante soluciones basadas en la naturaleza y la colaboración entre múltiples actores.

Durante dos días, integrantes de comunidades rurales, autoridades, organizaciones y otros actores locales trabajaron juntos para imaginar distintos escenarios, construidos en torno a factores de cambio que los participantes consideraron más críticos con base en su incertidumbre e impacto. ¿Cómo se vería esta subcuenca en medio de impactos climáticos frecuentes e intensos y de inestabilidad política? Esa fue la pregunta que abordó el grupo que trabajó sobre el escenario más adverso, al que titularon “Mi querida Santa Eulalia, te estás muriendo —¿dónde cantaremos las Hualinas…?”

El escenario más adverso, imaginado y dibujado por uno de los grupos del taller. Fuente: Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Más allá de las diferencias entre escenarios, ciertas respuestas aparecían una y otra vez. Y cuando las ordenamos, terminaron dibujando tres grandes ideas.

Primera idea: cuidar la infraestructura natural y ancestral

La primera fue la necesidad de fortalecer las infraestructuras hídricas naturales y ancestrales que durante siglos han permitido gestionar el agua en las montañas. Aquí, las amunas ocuparon un lugar central.

Las amunas son canales construidos en las partes altas de las montañas que captan el agua de lluvia durante la temporada húmeda y la conducen hacia terrenos permeables, donde se filtra y recarga el acuífero. Almacenada en el subsuelo, esa misma agua se libera gradualmente y vuelve a aflorar meses después, en la temporada seca, en manantiales más abajo en la ladera, justo cuando más se necesita. Es un sistema tan sencillo como ingenioso, heredado de tiempos prehispánicos y conservado de generación en generación. La práctica se conoce como “siembra y cosecha de agua”: se siembra cuando el agua es abundante para poder cosecharla cuando escasea.

Su impacto no es menor. Se estima que un kilómetro de amuna aporta alrededor de 148.000 metros cúbicos de agua al año, según los estudios de monitoreo de Aquafondo, y hasta la fecha se han restaurado cerca de 87 kilómetros de amunas. Pero quizá lo más revelador es que el agua sembrada en las montañas no se queda allí: viaja por el subsuelo y puede llegar mucho más lejos, incluso hasta las ciudades.

Bofedales —humedales altoandinos que almacenan agua (izquierda)— y una amuna restaurada (derecha): dos piezas de la infraestructura natural y ancestral que regula el agua en las alturas. Fuente: Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Segunda idea: recuperar y transmitir el conocimiento

La segunda fue la importancia de recuperar, visibilizar y transmitir el conocimiento ligado a estas prácticas, a través de programas educativos y culturales.

Esta idea me pareció especialmente poderosa. Porque lo que no se visibiliza rara vez se valora. Y lo que no se valora rara vez se transmite a las nuevas generaciones. Cuando ese conocimiento se pierde, no solo desaparecen técnicas o prácticas concretas: también se pierde una manera de entender el territorio, de relacionarse con el agua y de construir resiliencia.

Esta no es una intuición aislada. El propio Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (IPCC), en su informe sobre impactos, adaptación y vulnerabilidad (2022), reconoce que el conocimiento indígena y local ofrece una comprensión valiosa para actuar frente al riesgo climático y puede enriquecer las políticas y prácticas de adaptación. En las amunas, ese principio se vuelve tangible: un cuerpo de conocimiento de más de mil años de antigüedad que hoy demuestra ser una herramienta concreta para adaptarse a la incertidumbre hídrica.

Un grupo de personas, la mayoría en camisas y gorras azules, se reúnen alrededor de una mesa para ocmpartir sus experiencias y planear para el futuro.
Distintos actores —comunidades, autoridades y organizaciones— comparten sus conocimientos y visiones durante el taller en la subcuenca de Santa Eulalia. Fuente: Aquafondo.

Tercera idea: financiar lo que la montaña nos da

La tercera fue diseñar mecanismos de financiamiento para restaurar y mantener estos ecosistemas —y ahí, en cierto modo, se juega todo el esfuerzo—. Las amunas y los bofedales no se mantienen solos: necesitan manos que los restauren y recursos que hagan posible ese trabajo año tras año. La pregunta que estaba debajo de cada idea planteada en el taller era la misma: ¿quién paga por la infraestructura que hace posible el agua, y cómo llegan esos recursos a quienes la mantienen en pie?

No hay una sola respuesta, y por eso mismo vale la pena explorarla —desde instrumentos de financiamiento basados en el suelo hasta mecanismos voluntarios de conservación—. Este es el terreno en el que trabaja una institución como el Instituto Lincoln: articular cómo se usa, se gobierna y se financia el suelo, para que cuidar un territorio y pagar por ese cuidado dejen de ser dos decisiones separadas.

Lo que vale la pena subrayar es que no existen territorios aislados: el agua lo conecta todo. El agua que llega a Lima nace en las montañas, y mientras ese vínculo no se reconozca, quienes cuidan las fuentes en lo alto seguirán sosteniendo, casi en silencio, el abastecimiento de agua de millones de personas aguas abajo. El desafío es que estos mecanismos lleguen, sin diluirse en el camino, a las comunidades que cuidan el agua en las alturas.

La verdadera altura

Hoy, de vuelta en mi propia ciudad, apenas unos metros sobre el nivel del mar, todavía recuerdo aquel mareo que sentí en las montañas. Pero cuando pienso en este viaje, la altitud ya no es lo que más importa.

Lo que me queda es la imagen de comunidades que se reunieron para imaginar su futuro colectivo y, al hacerlo, reconocieron el valor del conocimiento acumulado a lo largo de generaciones. Quizá esa fue la verdadera altura alcanzada durante aquellos días: no la de los 4.500 metros sobre el nivel del mar, sino la de una conversación que llegó a lugares donde rara vez se piensa el futuro de manera colectiva, y donde el conocimiento del pasado todavía ofrece respuestas a los desafíos del mañana. Como lo expresó un integrante de la comunidad, con una sencillez que se me quedó grabada: “Muchas veces creemos que el pasado fue mejor, pero somos nosotros quienes podemos hacer que el futuro sea aún mejor”.

Un grupo de personas, la mayoría con gorras y camisas azules, se reúnen afuera para tomarse una foto.
Participantes del taller de planificación de escenarios exploratorios en la subcuenca de Santa Eulalia, mayo de 2026. Fuente: Aquafondo.

Melinda Maldonado es abogada basada en Argentina con Doctorado en Estudios Urbanos. Sus líneas de trabajo incluyen financiamiento urbano, cambio climático y conflictos urbano-ambientales. Tiene amplia experiencia como investigadora, docente y consultora en el sector público y privado. Es colaboradora del Programa para América Latina y el Caribe del Instituto Lincoln desde 2010 en cursos de cambio climático y fundamentos jurídicos de políticas de suelo. Aquí también es investigadora de financiamiento de medidas para el cambio climático con tributos y cargas urbanísticas, y especialmente las soluciones basadas en la naturaleza. 

Imagen principal: Integrantes del equipo del Instituto Lincoln y de Aquafondo recorren la zona de amunas, a unos 4.500 metros sobre el nivel del mar. Fuente: Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

President's Message

New Leadership for a Pivotal Moment

By Robert Puentes, July 21, 2026

A word from Lincoln Institute Chair Kathryn J. Lincoln:

When my father, David C. Lincoln, started the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in 1974, his purpose was clear. Like my grandfather before him, he believed that fostering a better understanding of urban economics, taxation, and land would “ensure that more people have the same opportunities, whatever their lot in life.” More than 50 years later, the Lincoln Institute remains committed to the goal of improving access to opportunity through land policy. In the early years of our sixth decade, I couldn’t be more pleased that Robert Puentes is taking the helm as our sixth president.

Rob, a veteran urban planner who served most recently as a leader at Brookings Metro and the Eno Center for Transportation, has said that land is in his DNA. I share that sentiment—it would be hard not to, given my roots—and I’m looking forward to working closely with Rob as he joins the Lincoln Institute family. In this, his first President’s Message, he shares his thoughts on why this is a critical moment for the Lincoln Institute, for land policy, and for communities around the world.


 

I am honored to join the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy as its new president and CEO. The opportunity to lead an institution with such a distinguished legacy of improving land policy education, research, and practice comes at a pivotal moment for communities across the United States and around the world. Local leaders are being asked to do more with less, and the Lincoln Institute’s role as a trusted, nonpartisan resource has never been more essential.

Headshot of Robert Puentes

Throughout my career, I have worked at the intersection of land use, infrastructure, and metropolitan development—where communities confront their most consequential challenges. From leading the Brookings Institution’s program on cities and metropolitan areas to serving as president of the Eno Center for Transportation, I have focused on developing data-driven, evidence-based solutions to the problems local leaders prioritize: improved accessibility for all residents, a healthier climate, and a stronger, more equitable economy. These priorities align directly with the Lincoln Institute’s mission to integrate land policy with social justice, economic opportunity, and environmental sustainability.

Land policy shapes how people live their daily lives—how they get to work, find housing, access services, and connect with one another. It determines housing affordability, economic development, environmental health, and climate resilience. As a local planning commissioner in Virginia, I saw firsthand how restrictive zoning perpetuates segregation and limits opportunity, and how fragmented land use decisions deepen climate vulnerability. But I also saw what becomes possible when communities capture the value of land and link land policy with infrastructure investment, housing strategies, and regional planning. This integrated perspective will guide my leadership at the Lincoln Institute, where our work must bridge traditional divides between disciplines and sectors—connecting planners with transportation professionals and water managers, public finance experts with development agencies, and local practitioners with state and regional policymakers—because today’s challenges are too complex to address in isolation.

As I step into this role, I envision several key priorities for the institute moving forward.

First, we must continue to strengthen the evidence base for sound land policy. This means producing rigorous, accessible research that helps practitioners understand what works, why it works, and how to adapt successful approaches to their local contexts. The Lincoln Institute has always been a leader in generating knowledge, and we will build on this foundation by engaging directly with new policy debates—here and abroad—where our expertise can bring rigor and independence to consequential national conversations.

Second, we must expand our role as convener and connector, while meeting practitioners where they are. Innovative solutions emerge when people from different backgrounds and sectors come together, and the Lincoln Institute is uniquely positioned to create spaces—physical and virtual—for practitioners, researchers, policymakers, and community leaders to build lasting partnerships.

Third, we must address equity head-on. Land policy has too often been a tool of exclusion and dispossession. We cannot change this history, but we can ensure today’s land policy decisions create opportunity rather than perpetuate inequality—work that falls increasingly to states, localities, and nonpartisan institutions like the Lincoln Institute. This means centering the experiences and expertise of communities that have been marginalized by past land policies, examining the distributional effects of policy proposals, and supporting practitioners who are working to advance equity in their communities.

Fourth, we must engage more directly with climate change. Land use decisions are fundamental to both mitigation and adaptation—whether that means linking development plans to water demand, enabling transit-oriented growth that cuts vehicle emissions, or implementing nature-based solutions, especially in climate-vulnerable areas. The Lincoln Institute must not only help practitioners navigate this complexity but also help fill the gap, providing the research, tools, and peer networks communities need to act with confidence.

Fifth, we must make sure the field benefits from our transformative partnership with Claremont Lincoln University. Through CLU’s degree programs and the Lincoln Vibrant Communities initiative, this collaboration opens new doors to strengthen the work of practitioners on the ground. We provide more than valuable research insights—we deliver the skills, credentials, and networks needed to drive lasting change. And as we keep evolving our education offerings—expanding digital learning, technical assistance, and peer learning—practitioners will find them increasingly relevant, accessible, and immediately applicable to the work they are already doing.

I recognize the ambitiousness of this agenda and approach this role clear-eyed about both the opportunities and challenges ahead. I am deeply humbled by the trust the Lincoln Institute Board of Directors has placed in me, and I pledge to uphold the highest standards of ethics, fair dealing, and transparency articulated by generations of the Lincoln family in all aspects of my work.

These issues are deeply personal to me. I grew up in a blue-collar family and understand that work is precious—that a job is a critical pathway out of poverty. I was the first in my family to attend college and know firsthand how transformative quality educational opportunities can be. Throughout my life, I have maintained a deep appreciation for place and the enormous importance of how land is used, taxed, and stewarded. These personal experiences inform my conviction that land policy is too important to be left to specialists alone. It affects everyone, and our work must be accessible, actionable, and grounded in the real challenges that communities face every day. I am committed to ensuring that the Lincoln Institute remains a trusted resource for researchers and practitioners, a vital source of knowledge for policymakers, and a catalyst for positive change in communities everywhere.

I look forward to working with the talented staff at the Lincoln Institute and with our extensive network of collaborators and practitioners across the country and around the world. Together, we can advance land policies that build more inclusive, sustainable, and prosperous communities for all.


Robert Puentes is president and CEO of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

 

La vista de la ciudad de Buenos Aires.

El trabajo a distancia y las ciudades: una nueva geografía del valor del suelo y los impuestos inmobiliarios

Por Luis Quintanilla y Xinrui Shi, July 8, 2026

La digitalización está transformando las bases fiscales de las ciudades en formas que van más allá de los impactos a corto plazo posteriores a la pandemia de COVID-19. Desde la expansión del trabajo a distancia e híbrido hasta la aparición de campos especializados en tecnologías computacionales, las economías digitales alteran los patrones de valor del suelo, la actividad económica y los ingresos públicos, y estos cambios generan nuevos desafíos para la resiliencia fiscal y la equidad tributaria. La investigación sobre los cambios en los valores de las propiedades comerciales derivados de estas tendencias ofrece un adelanto de algunas de las implicaciones fiscales y de la política de suelo de la economía digital. En una sesión sobre los impactos postpandemia del trabajo a distancia en la salud fiscal municipal, que se llevó a cabo dentro del marco de la última Land Policy Conference (Conferencia sobre Políticas de Suelo) del Instituto Lincoln, varios ponentes compartieron nueva evidencia empírica que apunta a dos conclusiones centrales: el trabajo a distancia llegó para quedarse, y la transformación digital introduce una incertidumbre fiscal nueva y desigual para las ciudades.

Kim Rueben, exasesora del Instituto Lincoln y actual presidenta del National Tax Association en los Estados Unidos, recordó que, cuando comenzó la pandemia, había una expectativa generalizada de una crisis fiscal severa. En Estados Unidos, el desempleo se había disparado hasta un 13 % en el segundo trimestre de 2020. Sin embargo, este indicador laboral había caído al 6,7 % hacia finales de ese año, y los presupuestos estatales y locales tuvieron un desempeño mucho mejor de lo previsto. Una razón clave fue la rápida expansión del trabajo a distancia entre quienes trabajaban en oficinas con salarios más altos, lo que permitió que la actividad económica —y las bases tributarias— se mantuvieran incluso cuando cambiaban los lugares de trabajo. El trabajo a distancia pasó de representar aproximadamente el 7 % de las jornadas laborales antes de la pandemia a casi el 25 % en el periodo posterior, con variaciones significativas entre sectores. La pregunta central, desde una perspectiva de políticas fiscales, es cómo este cambio estructural afecta al mercado inmobiliario comercial, la actividad en los centros urbanos y la capacidad de las ciudades para generar ingresos.

Posteriormente, Andrew Reschovsky, profesor emérito de la Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison, presentó un trabajo conjunto con Howard Chernick, profesor emérito de la Universidad Municipal de Nueva York, en el que se examina cómo el trabajo a distancia afecta la salud fiscal de las ciudades centrales de Estados Unidos, ya que debilita la base del impuesto a la propiedad comercial. En base a datos de 135 ciudades fiscalmente estandarizadas —que agregan ingresos y gastos de gobiernos locales superpuestos—, el estudio estima la exposición al trabajo a distancia de diversas ciudades, y combina patrones de teletrabajo por industria con distribuciones salariales a nivel local. Si se considera la reducción del trabajo presencial como un indicador de menor demanda de espacios de oficinas, los autores estiman una disminución promedio de alrededor del 24 % en la capacidad de generación de ingresos (RRC, por sus siglas en inglés) vinculada a la propiedad comercial, con impactos considerablemente mayores en ciudades como Boston, San Francisco y Nueva York.

Según los autores, la RRC de un gobierno municipal comprende su capacidad para obtener ingresos a partir de impuestos locales, así como de tarifas y cobros. Estas fuentes locales se complementan con las transferencias recibidas del gobierno estatal y el federal.

Sin embargo, al considerar la totalidad de las fuentes de ingresos de las ciudades —incluidos impuestos no relacionados con la propiedad, y tarifas y transferencias intergubernamentales—, la reducción promedio en la capacidad total de generación de ingresos es de aproximadamente un 2,9 %. Por lo tanto, el riesgo fiscal varía de forma considerable entre lugares: las ciudades que dependen en gran medida de los impuestos a la propiedad comercial, como Boston, enfrentan mayor vulnerabilidad, mientras que otras parecen relativamente menos expuestas desde una perspectiva fiscal a los efectos del trabajo a distancia.

Una oficina vacía con una pared de ventanas con vista al resto de la ciudad.
El trabajo a distancia llegó para quedarse. Una oficina vacía tiene una hermosa vista de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Crédito: lechatnoir vía Getty Images.

Por su parte, la investigación de Karen Chapple en la Universidad de Toronto, que utiliza datos anónimos de movilidad de teléfonos celulares para rastrear la actividad en los centros urbanos tras la pandemia, reafirma estas diferenciaciones. Al captar todas las formas de actividad —y no solo la ocupación de las oficinas—, su análisis no encuentra evidencia hasta la fecha de un “ciclo de decadencia fiscal” generalizado en diversas ciudades norteamericanas. Incluso bajo escenarios de mayor trabajo a distancia, los impactos fiscales estimados que derivan de la reducción de los impuestos a la propiedad comercial siguen siendo modestos. En cambio, los patrones de recuperación fiscal están determinados principalmente por la estructura económica de las ciudades y por lo accesibles que son sus centros de trabajo. Los centros urbanos dominados por sectores como la tecnología, las finanzas y los servicios profesionales —los más compatibles con el trabajo a distancia— tienden a recuperarse de manera más lenta, mientras que lugares con menor concentración de este tipo de industrias y con trayectos más cortos desde los hogares hasta los centros laborales muestran mayor recuperación.

Cynthia Goytia, de la Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, amplió el análisis más allá de ciudades norteamericanas, y presentó los resultados de uno de los primeros estudios sobre los impactos del teletrabajo en el área metropolitana de Buenos Aires. El estudio, en el que se utilizaron datos de movilidad de teléfonos celulares y una amplia base de datos de precios de alquiler, encuentra un aplanamiento significativo de la curva de rentas urbanas en la zona metropolitana, lo que refleja una reducción en las diferencias de valor del suelo entre áreas urbanas y suburbanas de Buenos Aires. Por lo general, la curva de renta urbana muestra una disminución del valor del suelo y sus rentas a medida que aumenta la distancia con respecto al distrito central de negocios de las ciudades. El trabajo a distancia ha permitido que hogares de mayores ingresos se trasladen a municipios periféricos, lo que aumenta, en consecuencia, la demanda y el valor de estas zonas. “Al viajar al centro solo algunos días a la semana, la distancia pesa menos en su decisión de dónde vivir, y eso eleva la demanda y el valor del suelo en esas zonas”, comenta Goytia.

En el ámbito fiscal, el estudio destaca una relación débil entre el aumento de los valores de la propiedad en áreas periféricas o suburbios y los ingresos locales en tales zonas, lo que puede estar impulsado por barreras políticas e institucionales para la tributación inmobiliaria. En respuesta, los gobiernos locales experimentan con mecanismos de financiamiento basados en el suelo y con instrumentos tributarios más progresivos, en algunos casos apoyados por herramientas digitales para el monitoreo de incrementos de valores inmobiliarios. “A diferencia del debate en las ciudades de Estados Unidos, centrado en la caída de la propiedad comercial en los centros, en nuestra región un nuevo desafío es el de capturar el valor que se está generando en las periferias para financiar su desarrollo”, señala Goytia.

En síntesis, este conjunto de estudios subraya que, si bien la digitalización y el trabajo a distancia durante la pandemia no han desencadenado una crisis fiscal generalizada, sí han reconfigurado el riesgo fiscal municipal en formas específicas según la estructura espacial y económica de cada lugar. Al respecto, Goytia concluye lo siguiente: “para las ciudades latinoamericanas, esta puede ser la oportunidad de transformar un riesgo fiscal en una agenda concreta de modernización tributaria y extrafiscal”.


Xinrui Shi lidera el Program on Comparative Law and Property Rights (Programa en Ley Comparativa y Derechos de Propiedad) en el Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Luis Felipe Quintanilla es analista de políticas para el Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo.

Imagen principal: Vista aérea de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Crédito: Ale Haarlem via iStock/Getty Images Plus.

Events

Big City Planning Directors Institute 2026

October 25, 2026 - October 27, 2025

Cambridge, MA United States

Offered in English

For this in-person, invite-only event, the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy brings planning directors from the largest US cities to Cambridge, Massachusetts, for a three-day summit at the Lincoln Institute offices. The Big City Planning Directors Institute is a collaboration of the Lincoln Institute, Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design, and the American Planning Association. Planning directors will examine emerging public policy questions that influence the planning and design of large cities and their metropolitan regions.

This event is by invitation only.


Details

Date
October 25, 2026 - October 27, 2025
Location
Cambridge, MA United States
Language
English

Keywords

Community Development, Urban Development

Land Wise
Blog Post
Three people walk along a trail. A rocky mountain obscures most of the sky behind them.

Sowing Water, Sowing the Future in the High Mountains of Peru

By Melinda Lis Maldonado, July 8, 2026

The pickup truck stopped and I knew it was time to get out. Following the advice of the “water guardian” I had just met, I opened the door and waited a few seconds before exiting. I breathed in the dense mountain air and stepped down carefully. I had walked only a few meters before I felt in my body the weight of more than 4,500 meters (14,760 feet) of altitude. I paused for a moment, a little dizzy, waiting for the vertigo to pass.

None of that kept me from standing there, taking in the landscape. Before me stretched the Andean mountains of Peru, imposing and silent. As I looked out over the scene, I thought it was probably the highest place I had ever reached in my life—and I wondered whether the Lincoln Institute had ever reached so high….

Yet the altitude was only the beginning of the story.

Imagining the Future of a Sub-Basin

The mountain visit took place the day before a workshop on water resilience in the Santa Eulalia sub-basin, many meters lower down. The gathering was part of a process that had been unfolding for several months that seeks to strengthen capacity across Latin America and the Caribbean to imagine and prepare for uncertain futures in the context of water.

The tool behind that exercise is exploratory scenario planning (XSP): Rather than betting on a single predictable or desirable future, XSP sets out to navigate a range of uncertain futures and then return to the present to design strategies accordingly.

Santa Eulalia is one of five cases that make up this regional initiative, led by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy through its Consortium for Scenario Planning and its land and water program, the Babbitt Center for Land and Water Policy. Local implementation was carried out by Aquafondo, the Water Fund for Lima and Callao, an organization that promotes water security through nature-based solutions and collaboration among multiple stakeholders.

Over two days, members of rural communities, authorities, organizations, and other local stakeholders worked together to imagine different future scenarios for the basin, built around the driving forces participants considered most critical in terms of their uncertainty and impact. What would this sub-basin look like amid frequent, intense climate impacts and political instability? The group working on the most adverse scenario asked that question, titling the scenario “My dear Santa Eulalia, you are dying—where will we sing the hualinas…?” Hualinas are traditional Peruvian songs that pay tribute to water.

The most adverse scenario (left), imagined and drawn by one of the workshop groups (right). Credit: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Despite the differences among scenarios, certain answers came up again and again, aligning with three broad ideas.

First Idea: Caring for Natural and Ancestral Infrastructure

The first idea concerned the need to strengthen the natural and ancestral water infrastructures that for centuries have made it possible to manage water in the mountains. Here, the amunas took center stage.

The amunas are channels built in the upper reaches of the mountains that capture rainwater during the wet season and carry it across permeable terrain, where it slowly infiltrates the subsoil. Months later, in the dry season, that same water resurfaces lower down, just when it is needed most. It is a system as simple as it is ingenious, inherited from pre-Hispanic times and preserved from generation to generation. The practice is known as “sowing and harvesting water”: You sow when water is abundant so you can harvest it when it is scarce.

Its impact is no small thing. Estimates say one kilometer of amuna contributes around 148,000 cubic meters (39 million gallons) of water per year, according to Aquafondo’s monitoring studies, and to date about 87 kilometers (54 miles) of amunas have been restored. But perhaps most revealing is that the water sown in the mountains does not stay there: It travels through the subsoil and can reach much farther, even to the cities.

Bofedales—high-Andean wetlands that store water (left)—and a restored amuna (right): two pieces of the natural and ancestral infrastructure that regulates water in the highlands. Credit: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Second Idea: Recovering and Passing on Knowledge

The second idea addressed the importance of recovering, making visible, and passing on the knowledge tied to these practices, through educational and cultural programs.

This idea struck me as especially powerful. Because what is not made visible is rarely valued. And what is not valued is rarely passed on to new generations. When that knowledge is lost, not only do specific techniques or practices disappear—so does a way of understanding the territory, of relating to water, and of building resilience.

This is not an isolated intuition. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change itself, in its report on impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, recognizes that Indigenous and local knowledge offers valuable understanding for acting on climate risk and can enrich adaptation policies and practices. In the amunas, that principle becomes tangible: A body of knowledge more than 1,000 years old proves to be a concrete tool for adapting to water uncertainty today.

A group of people, many wearing matching blue shirts and caps, gather around a table to share their experiences and plan for the future.
Representatives of different stakeholder groups—including communities, authorities, and organizations—shared their knowledge and visions during the workshop in the Santa Eulalia sub-basin. Credit: Aquafondo.

Third Idea: Financing What the Mountain Gives Us

The third idea was to design financing mechanisms to restore and maintain these ecosystems—and this, in a way, is where the whole effort is decided. Amunas and bofedales do not maintain themselves: they need hands to restore them and resources that make that work possible year after year. The question underlying every idea raised in the workshop was the same: who pays for the infrastructure that makes water possible, and how do those resources reach the people who keep it functioning?

There is no single answer, and that is why it is worth exploring—from land-based financing instruments to voluntary conservation mechanisms. This is exactly the intersection where the Lincoln Institute works: tying together how land is used, governed, and financed, so that caring for a territory and paying for that care stop being two separate decisions.

Water connects everything. The water that reaches Lima is born in the mountains, and as long as that link goes unrecognized, those who care for the sources high up will keep sustaining, almost in silence, the water supply of millions downstream. The challenge is for these mechanisms to reach the communities that care for water in the highlands, without being diluted along the way.

The True Height

Today, back in my own city, just a few meters above sea level, I still remember that dizziness I felt in the mountains. But when I think about this trip, the altitude is no longer what matters most.

What stays with me is the image of communities that came together to imagine their collective future and, in doing so, recognized the value of knowledge accumulated over generations. Perhaps that was the true height reached during those days: not the 4,500 meters above sea level, but the conversation that reached places where the future is rarely considered collectively, and where knowledge of the past still offers answers to the challenges of tomorrow. As one community member put it, with a simplicity that stayed with me: “We often believe the past was better, but we are the ones who can make the future even better.”

A group of people, most of whom are wearing matching blue shirts and caps, gather outside for a photo, waving at the camera.
Participants in the exploratory scenario planning (XSP) workshop in the Santa Eulalia sub-basin, May 2026. Credit: Aquafondo.

Melinda Maldonado is an Argentina-based lawyer with a PhD in Urban Studies, specializing in urban finance, climate change, and urban-environmental conflicts. She has extensive experience as a researcher, lecturer, and consultant across both the public and private sectors. A collaborator with the Lincoln Institute’s Latin America and Caribbean Program since 2010, she teaches courses on climate change and urban law. Her work currently focuses on land value capture as a means of financing climate measures, particularly nature-based solutions.

Lead image: Members of the Lincoln Institute and Aquafondo teams walk along the amunas (high-altitude rainwater channels) at around 4,500 meters above sea level in the Andes of Peru. The two organizations recently ran a scenario planning workshop focused on water resilience in the Santa Eulalia sub-basin. Credit: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Course

Derecho Urbanístico Latinoamericano: Fundamentos, Instrumentos y Desafíos

September 3, 2026 - October 30, 2026

Online

Offered in Spanish


El curso de Derecho Urbanístico latinoamericano ofrece una propuesta académica pionera para comprender el papel de esta disciplina en la transformación de las ciudades de América Latina. Su currículo articula fundamentos clásicos con problemáticas emergentes —como el cambio climático y la gestión del suelo— para brindar herramientas conceptuales y prácticas. Dirigido tanto a expertos como a principiantes, busca consolidar una base de conocimiento sólida que permita incidir en la construcción de marcos normativos y políticas urbanas más justas, promoviendo la función social de la propiedad y el derecho a la ciudad. 

Ver detalles de la convocatoria.


Details

Date
September 3, 2026 - October 30, 2026
Application Deadline
August 3, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Location
Online
Language
Spanish

Keywords

Legal Issues, Planning, Urban Design, Urban Upgrading and Regularization

Premio Lincoln al periodismo sobre políticas urbanas, desarrollo sostenible y cambio climático 2026

El Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo convoca a periodistas de toda América Latina a participar del concurso “Premio Lincoln al periodismo sobre políticas urbanas, desarrollo sostenible y cambio climático”, cuyo objetivo es promover los trabajos periodísticos de investigación y divulgación que cubran temas relacionados con políticas de suelo y desarrollo urbano sostenible. El premio, ya en su quinto año, está dedicado a la memoria de Tim Lopes, un periodista brasileño asesinado mientras investigaba para un reportaje sobre las favelas de Rio de Janeiro.

Convocamos a periodistas de toda América Latina a participar de este concurso. Recibimos postulaciones para el premio hasta el 30 de agosto de 2026. Para ver detalles sobre la convocatoria, haga clic en el botón “Guía/Guidelines” o consulte el archivo titulado “Guía/Guidelines”.


Apply

Application Deadline: August 30, 2026 at 11:59 PM


Application Period
July 2, 2026 – August 30, 2026
Language
Spanish

Keywords

Climate Mitigation, Local Government, Planning