Topic: Meio Ambiente

Irrigation lawn sprinkler spreading water over backyard grass in dry season to keep it green and fresh.

The Overlooked Land Policy Juggernaut That Controls Millions of Acres in the US: Can HOAs Get Better at Sustainability?

By Jon Gorey, Setembro 15, 2026

Even if you don’t belong to a homeowners association, you’ve probably heard an HOA horror story or two. News reports, dinner parties, and message boards are awash with impassioned rants about HOA overreach.   

Residents of a California HOA expressed outrage after being cited for flying American flags ahead of the nation’s 250th anniversary, for example, while one Reddit user reported being ordered to take down an inflatable kiddie pool because “above-ground pools are not allowed.” HOA battles can often get into the weeds—and not just figuratively. In Maryland, a couple whose HOA fined them for planting native flowers and shrubs instead of a typical turfgrass lawn managed to fight back and change state law, while a Colorado resident said his HOA board cited him for a brown lawn during a historically severe statewide drought in June. And in 2025, in a particularly galling example, a Florida homeowner whose HOA repeatedly cited her for brown grass and other violations was forced to spend a week in jail after missing a related hearing, and later faced potential foreclosure over the accumulated legal fees.

Isolated incidents do not prove a pattern of misbehavior. However, there is one HOA trend that is hard to ignore: “The industry is big, and it’s getting bigger,” says Jake Gold, executive director of the Foundation for Community Association Research.

In 2009, 62 percent of new single-family homes sold in the United States were part of a homeowners association, according to Census data. But since 2020, four out of every five new houses sold in the US belonged to an HOA. In just the past eight years, 5 million new single-family houses built in the US were part of an HOA.

This growing trend among homebuilders has placed an enormous amount of privately owned acreage in the control of homeowners associations—mandatory membership organizations, whose residents pay annual dues in exchange for community benefits, and are bound by certain governing documents.

There are about 373,000 community associations across the US—a tenfold increase since 1980—home to more than 78 million residents in 29.6 million homes, according to a 2025 Fact Book published by the Foundation for Community Association Research. Municipalities tend to welcome community associations, Gold notes, because they “take on some things that the local government doesn’t have to fund themselves,” from sidewalks to snow removal to streetlights.

Of those nearly 30 million association homes, an estimated 58 to 63 percent are in an HOA, as opposed to a condominium complex or cooperative; the average density among the largest HOA communities is two to four units per acre. Some back-of-the-envelope math, then, suggests that, in the US, about 4.3 million to 8.7 million acres of land—an area at least the size of Hawaii and potentially as big as Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island combined—may be under HOA management, for better or worse.

In terms of environmental sustainability, it’s often been the latter—but it doesn’t have to be. “Community associations represent one of the largest collective models of land stewardship in the United States, yet the scale of their environmental impact is often overlooked,” Gold says. “With tens of millions of residents and millions of acres under management, these communities are uniquely positioned to advance practical sustainability efforts at the local level.”

‘My HOA Won’t Let Me’

As in many HOAs, most of the common grounds at the Rhondda Townhome Community in Chester County, Pennsylvania, are covered in a carpet of green turfgrass. Most, but not all—not anymore. A quarter-acre meadow now blooms with an array of native flowers, from golden Alexanders in the springtime, to purple coneflowers and black-eyed Susans in summer, to goldenrod and asters in fall.

Unlike turfgrass, those native plants boost biodiversity by providing essential food and habitat for dozens of species of caterpillars and other wildlife. They add more color and texture to the landscape, too. “Next month we’ll start to see the coreopsis and the penstemon, and they look fabulous together,” said longtime Rhondda resident Kathy Tracy, a Pennsylvania master naturalist, in an interview this spring. “It’s beautiful when the wind blows, it’s like an ocean of white and gold waving back and forth.”

It was Tracy, along with fellow Rhondda resident and master naturalist Toni Gorkin, who helped get the association to think beyond a lawn when it came time to dredge its upper retention pond in 2022. “They were just going to plant grass around it, but Toni was on the [HOA] board at the time, and she convinced them to let us put a meadow in there between the road and the pond,” Tracy says.

The duo had already planted a small but popular native pollinator garden; for this much larger project, the dredged sediment, spread around the perimeter of the pond in a thick, mucky layer, did some of the hard work for them, smothering the existing turfgrass and creating a nutrient-packed seed bed.

purple coneflowers and other flowers bloom in the wildflower meadow at Rhonnda Community in Pennsylvania, with a pond and lawns in the background
Oxeye sunflower and purple coneflowers bloom in the quarter-acre wildflower meadow at the Rhondda Townhome Community in Chester County, Pennsylvania, in 2025. Credit: Chester County Planning Commission.

Aside from a few early grumbles, when it looked like weeds were growing in, the response from the townhome community has been overwhelmingly positive. “They thought it was spectacular,” Tracy says. “I have people from other homeowners associations coming around to see it and to see how we did it… and the people in the community love it, too.”

In nearby Radnor, Pennsylvania, the Inverary Community partnered with the Willistown Conservation Trust to convert eight acres of lawn into a native wildflower meadow. Residents were happy to approve the conversion—especially after they discovered how much the HOA would save in lawn mowing costs each year.

When it comes to the area’s HOAs, Rhondda and Inverary remain exceptions, says Rachael Griffith, director of sustainability for the Chester County Planning Commission (CCPC). But it also proves the collective ecological impact that small changes in these communities could have, given their ubiquity.

Nearly half of the county’s housing units are in an HOA, Griffith notes, along with 18,000 acres of common open space. After the county adopted its climate action plan in 2021, she says, “There was a lot of interest from people in homeowners associations who were saying, ‘These things you’re talking about in the climate action plan are great, but I can’t do any of them, because my HOA won’t let me.’”

That prompted the CCPC to create a series of HOA Sustainability Action Plan templates, inspired by a Sustainable Maryland certification program, to help local HOAs become better stewards of the land they manage. Because while there are many actions local governments can and should take to improve environmental health and sustainability, Griffith says, one of the simplest “is just to let the people who want to do these things actually do them.”

The Covenant

As it stands, many HOA residents who try to adopt even basic sustainability measures—from installing solar panels to simply limiting their use of weed killer—may find themselves stymied by either explicit rules or implicit social pressures.

“It’s not like HOAs are above the law or outside the law,” says Solomon Greene, former executive director of land and communities at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. But unlike municipal governments, HOAs provide public sector-like services under private legal contracts and covenants, says Greene, who now leads the Center for Housing Research and Innovative Solutions at the University of Denver. “That allows them to exert quite a bit of control over their communities.”

a graph showing total new single family home sales in the US, split by HOA and non-HOA houses, from 2009-2025
A 2022 study published in Landscape and Urban Planning sought to measure whether typical HOA rules were helping or hurting sustainability in the built environment. In an analysis of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) in place at homeowners associations in a suburban Michigan county, the authors found that 45 percent of HOAs examined required regular lawn maintenance, and 58 percent prohibited brush piles, which can create valuable habitat for wildlife.

Study coauthor Madeline Carr, now a doctoral student at Michigan State University, said most of the HOA lawn regulations did not explicitly specify excessive water, fertilizer, or herbicide use—yet multiple studies have shown that HOA residents tend to use more water and fertilizer than other homeowners. “Even if it’s not required, people just kind of assume that’s what they need to do,” Carr says. “A lot of it is driven more by norms and expectations.”

HOA rules can sabotage sustainability in other ways, too, prohibiting residents from installing solar panels, electric vehicle chargers, or efficient accessory dwelling units (ADUs)—even in places like California, where ADUs have been legalized statewide. HOA rules that specify or prohibit certain building materials or practices can create environmental impacts as well.

For instance, 45 percent of the HOAs studied only allowed for impervious driveway surfaces, such as pavement or concrete, which can exacerbate stormwater run-off and carry sediment and toxins into waterways. And four out of five HOAs (81 percent) mandated minimum home sizes, preventing residents from building smaller, more energy-efficient homes. Nationwide, the authors note, the average HOA home is about 400 square feet larger than a non-HOA home.

Meanwhile, a quarter (26 percent) of the HOAs studied forbade clotheslines, and almost a third (32 percent) had rules blocking renewable energy, such as rooftop solar panels or wind turbines. That last figure aligns with the results of a Chester County survey of HOA residents and board members, in which nearly a third of respondents said their HOA did not allow solar panels.

“A lot of HOAs are behind the times on solar panels,” Tracy says. “I had to bug my HOA for a year before I could finally get solar panels put on my house.” She notes that Pennsylvania is currently weighing a state law that would override HOA restrictions on solar power, similar to laws passed in Michigan, California, Texas, Florida, and other states in recent years.

An investigation by Sightline Institute found that many community associations in the Pacific Northwest block residents from installing heat pumps—which, because they simply transfer heat rather than burning fuel, operate three to five times more efficiently than combustion heat sources—through aesthetic or noise restrictions, burdensome approval requirements, or de facto or outright bans. Washington State, at least, has passed a law that explicitly protects a homeowner’s right to install a heat pump, as well as solar panels.

While such laws prevent associations from flat-out banning or placing excessive restrictions on solar panels, heat pumps, or other sustainability measures, some stubborn HOAs can still make the application process tedious enough to dissuade less motivated residents.

dozens of similar new construction single-family homes in Collin County, Texas, with a community pool, playground, recreational facilities
Four out of five new houses sold in the US each year belong to a homeowners association (HOA). Credit: Trong Nguyen/Getty Images.

Overcoming Inertia

Study coauthor Daniel Boyd Kramer, professor of conservation biology at Michigan State University, became interested in HOAs after searching for a site to build his eco-friendly dream home—one that most HOAs deemed too small to permit. “I just kept running into things like, ‘You can’t have solar panels, we don’t want solar panels in our neighborhood,’” he says. “These restrictions got me thinking: How common are HOAs, and what are they doing that might be working against this idea of residential sustainability?”

A lot of those unhelpful rules can be chalked up to simple inertia, Kramer says. “For the most part, HOAs get their bylaws and their codes, covenants, and restrictions from the initial builders, so whatever they inherit typically sticks,” he says. Changes to the CC&Rs often require approval by a supermajority of homeowners, so they can “shape HOAs for decades.”

But in cases where an HOA does change its rules—or starts out with intentionally sustainable language in its CC&Rs—it can make a big difference.

In a follow-up study, Carr conducted front-yard surveys at Wisconsin HOAs to determine whether “pro-environmental” landscaping clauses—for example, restrictions on overall lawn size, or requirements for a minimum amount of native plant cover—made any difference. She found that these clauses had a tangible real-world impact: Homes in the admittedly few HOAs with such pro-environmental clauses in their CC&Rs had about four times as much native plant cover in their front yards as other homes (29.5 percent vs. 6.9 percent), on average, and far less lawn area as well.

What surprised Carr was that, in some cases, it was the builders themselves, not activist residents, who had implemented the sustainable landscaping rules. “The two HOAs that had the most extensive native plant requirements, those actually were put in place by the developer,” Carr says. “It wasn’t like the residents led the charge on it. The developer wanted to have prairie neighborhoods … and they paid for shared management of that whole prairie area. They would have [prescribed] burns and things like that.”


Abutting conservation land, the Noll Valley HOA in Wisconsin embraces its prairie landscape.

In more typical associations, Carr says, the CC&Rs often read like boilerplate text copied from a previous development. To that end, Carr has been drafting a more sustainable set of model CC&Rs that developers could draw from when forming a new homeowners association.

Incorporating sustainable rules and practices at the outset, during the development stage, is “the most important opportunity,” says Gold. “Once those CC&Rs are recorded, it can be kind of difficult to change them, so getting them right at the beginning is very critical.”

Developers should leave room for flexibility and avoid the use of “outdated restrictions in the covenants themselves,” Gold says, “like requiring turfgrass everywhere, for example, or limiting new technologies like solar or EV charging…. Just allowing communities to be able to adapt to things that are changing all the time, without having to amend those CC&Rs every time.”

Learning About Landscapes

While many homeowners associations across the semi-arid Southwest have now embraced low-water xeriscaping and abandoned requirements for residents to maintain green lawns in drought-prone areas—The Grand, outside of Phoenix, for example, no longer allows new turfgrass installation—HOAs nationwide still have a reputation for homogenous landscaping.

Beyond governing what people can or can’t grow in their yards, most HOAs also maintain significant common area landscapes. “The land that is held as common open space in HOAs is typically the undevelopable land, but that is the land with all the natural resources,” Griffith says, “where there’s a stream or steep slopes or forests or something like that.”

People often assume it’s best to let nature take its course in these areas, Griffith says, but such landscapes can require more active management—removing invasive species and protecting stream banks from erosion, for example. Northeastern forests now struggle to regenerate, she adds, as deer devour the native understory but ignore invasive plants, allowing harmful species to choke out the trees. “You can’t just let the forest go, you should really be getting in there and managing things to improve its health,” Griffith says. “It’s just not knowledge or skills that a lot of people have, so there’s a huge opportunity for education in these communities.”

In Rhondda, Tracy says the pollinator garden and wildflower meadow create conversations and opportunities to educate fellow residents, many of whom stop to chat while she’s gardening. She even brings some fresh cut flowers to the local town offices and police station each week, and encourages the recipients to scatter the spent flowers in their home gardens to spread the seeds.

Some lessons are harder to convey than others, though.

While residents love the meadow in bloom, Tracy says, “a lot of people want to cut it down as soon as it stops flowering. Instead you’re supposed to leave everything over the winter, because the seeds that are on all these flowers drop over the winter, and reseed themselves,” she says. “Plus the birds eat them, plus it gives the bees a little area to tunnel down into the ground.”

In fact, even many professional landscapers are relative novices when it comes to managing native plants and shrubs, and are quick to mow down pollinator patches they mistake for weeds.

“We did have a little bit of a setback last year, because they were supposed to cut the grass around the lower pond, and somehow signals got crossed and they cut the whole meadow down,” Tracy says. “That happened the year before too.… We finally found a natural plant contractor who’s going to cut it down the right way next year in the early spring.”

Griffith says the yard care industry needs to catch up to consumers who are concerned about the chemicals landscapers use on their lawns. “People see the signs, ‘Please keep your kids and pets off the lawn,’ and they start to wonder, ‘Why do I need to keep my kids and pets off?’” she says. “There’s a huge demand for more tailored land management and lawn care practices, but that demand is not being met in the landscaping industry.”

before and after photos of the wildflower meadow at Inverary Community; the top photo shows a sprawling green lawn, while the bottom photo shows a field of wildflowers in bloom with a few houses in the backdrop
The Inverary Community in Radnor, Pennsylvania, partnered with a local conservation group to convert eight acres of lawn (top) to native meadow (bottom). Credit: Chester County Planning Commission.

Become the Board

Many HOAs are managed by boards composed of volunteer residents, who therefore have outsized leverage on communal land use decisions. It’s one thing to simply be allowed to plant natives in front of your townhouse or to install solar panels on your own roof—but charting a more sustainable course for an entire community can make an even bigger impact.

Board members can change bylaws, harness the HOA’s collective purchasing power to procure sustainable equipment or services, and even amend an association’s CC&Rs if residents vote in favor. The CCPC maintains an action plan menu with over 100 steps an HOA can take to improve community sustainability across a variety of contexts, from energy and efficiency to resident education to woodlands and tree canopy management.

Dee Rapposelli, a master gardener, retired medical writer, and somewhat reluctant HOA board president, can attest to the many opportunities available to residents who get involved.

When Rapposelli was house hunting several years ago, it was the backyard that attracted her to her townhouse in an over-55 association near the Connecticut coast. “There was a beautiful garden in the back, and then there was a little pathway that led to a clearing,” she says. Upon moving in, she set about cleaning up the rubble-strewn clearing, “pulling rocks out of the ground like I was harvesting potatoes,” she says, and lining paths with them. “Then I began trying to identify what was there, cleaning up what I didn’t want to be there, so that it’s a registered pollinator pathway now.”

Neighbors took notice of her proactive efforts around the grounds, and she soon found herself “volunteered” to serve on the HOA’s board; later she was named vice president, then president. She’s tried to implement more sustainable and native-friendly landscaping practices while still respecting residents’ expectations about open space. The HOA board decides what kind of shrubs can go in front yards, for example, and Rapposelli has led the effort to encourage native species and discourage aggressive introduced species such as the popular rose-of-sharon.

“Everyone wants to have their green lawn,” Rapposelli concedes. “So in my head, there are certain areas where there’s cultivated turf, and other areas where there’s flora, and areas where there’s space for native plants and wildlife and for native insects. My intention here is to have a balance of that where people feel comfortable.”


How to Change HOA Practices  

Depending on the size and organizational structure of a homeowners association, changing the rules can be a challenge—especially if board members or residents resist such efforts. It helps to get neighbors on board with your vision, to thoroughly research local or state laws and successful examples, and to keep exchanges courteous and in writing. For HOA residents and boards who do want to adopt more sustainable practices, the Chester County (Pennsylvania) Planning Commission compiled a list of over 100 suggested action items touching on resident engagement, partnerships, and other levers of change. Among their suggestions:

  • Locate your community’s bylaws and covenants and conduct a sustainability audit to identify barriers to implementing sustainable practices.
  • Ask your utility provider to conduct an energy audit for common spaces and facilities.
  • Use a solar calculator tool to estimate what your HOA could save by installing solar panels on common buildings, and present this information to the HOA board.
  • Amend HOA covenants to allow native wildflower meadows in common areas, and to explicitly permit native plants, vegetable gardens, and composting in private yards.
  • Ensure your HOA’s rules permit residents to install stormwater management features on their own property, including rain gardens, rain barrels, downspout planters, and pervious pavement. If they do not, amend the document to permit these practices.
  • Install bike racks near open space or common recreation areas to encourage cycling.
  • When reviewing applications for garage renovations, encourage applicants to install an EV charger, or adequate electric service for future EV charging, as part of the project.

Even in an HOA, there are ways to design a native landscape “that looks ornamental,” Rapposelli says. But, echoing what Tracy and Griffith found in Pennsylvania, she admits it can be challenging to find an affordable landscaper who understands that approach and how to maintain it. She hopes to change roles in the coming year, from president to director of grounds, which would put her in closer contact with landscaping contractors.

Either way—and despite the added responsibility of the role—she’s grateful for the chance to improve the natural environment around her HOA. Rapposelli suggests sustainability-minded HOA residents volunteer to serve on their board, or simply ask to form a committee.

“You can say you want to start a gardening club, or you want to have a landscaping committee,” she says. An HOA board will often accept such requests, Rapposelli says, grateful for any kind of community engagement besides the typical complaints about services.

From there, infectious enthusiasm goes a long way. “Get on committees, get on the board, and instead of wagging your finger, ‘You shouldn’t do this’—make it hip,” she says. Native gardening can be framed as a hobby, solar power as a technological wonder that, paired with an EV charger, converts sunbeams into road trips.

“Be enthusiastic, and you’ll see people do get interested,” Rapposelli says. “If you want change, you have to be that change.”


Jon Gorey is a staff writer at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. 

Lead image: Irrigation sprinklers watering neatly mown green lawns. Credit: Bilanol/Getty Images.

Blog Post
Photo of open space in New York City's Central Park, with the Manhattan skyline in the background behind colorful trees in autumn.

Lincoln Institute at Climate Week NYC 2026

By Kristina McGeehan, Setembro 5, 2026

Global leaders, local policymakers, and grassroots changemakers will gather September 20–27 for Climate Week NYC, the world’s largest climate event. This year’s convening, focused on the energy, impact, and action we drive together, will have dozens of breakouts, roundtables, plenary sessions, and side events. 

The Lincoln Institute will participate in several events as part of Climate Week NYC: 

Resilient Communities and Affordable Energy  

September 23, 1–3 p.m. ET, Inclusiv Headquarters (by invitation only) 

Earlier this year, the Center for Impact Finance (CIF) at the Lincoln Institute published “Resilient Communities and Affordable Energy: Charting Roles for Community Finance,” which reflects perspectives from the community finance sector about the strategic opportunities and challenges ahead. The report highlights how community lenders have continued to work to expand access to clean, affordable energy amid shifting federal support. 

Building on the report, CIF will join Inclusiv, a nonprofit network of community development credit unions, for an interactive session where community lenders will discuss different types of collaborations and how to leverage strategic partnerships to expand reach and impact. 

Driving Freshwater Resilience for Climate-Threatened River Basins 

September 23, 5–6 p.m., presented by Panda House 

Science Based Targets Network’s (SBTN) Freshwater Hub is a collaborative effort led by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and World Resources Institute (WRI), along with the Pacific Institute, The Nature Conservancy, CDP, and Conservation International. Together, these partners have developed some of the leading frameworks, tools, methods, and guidance for water impact assessment, management, and reporting. To support this effort, the Lincoln Institute and its Center for Geospatial Solutions have joined the WWF to accelerate the development of the Basin Threshold Tool (BTT), an open-source platform that compiles and displays basin water flows, levels, storage, and quality around the world. Its database includes data, methods, and supporting information designed to help companies as they set science-based freshwater targets.

The Lincoln Institute and WWF will be launching the Basin Threshold Tool at Climate Week NYC with a panel discussion on corporate water engagement and policy and a technical demonstration of the tool, focusing on the Rio Grande River. We look forward to a great discussion on how the BTT can aid stakeholders in tracking basin conditions at different scales, advancing net-zero goals, and making informed water management decisions. 

Architecture, Planning, and International Law: Building Postcarbon Futures 

September 23, 6:30–8:00 p.m., presented by the Center for Brooklyn History and the Architectural League 

The Brooklyn Public Library’s Center for Brooklyn History and the Architectural League are hosting a conversation about what it will take to build a more just and sustainable future, inspired by the Lincoln Institute’s newest book, Building Postcarbon Futures: Land, Justice, and Energy Transitions, by Billy Fleming. Drawing on the 29 innovative climate justice projects highlighted in the book, Fleming will join Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, Daniel Aldana Cohen, and Keller Easterling to explore how to reduce emissions while creating more just, equitable, and resilient communities.  

More information about Climate Week programming can be found on the Climate Week NYC website.


Kristina McGeehan is director of communications at the Lincoln Institute.

Lead image: Open lawn in New York City’s Central Park, featuring colorful autumn trees in front of the Manhattan skyline. Credit: StockSeller_ukr via iStock/Getty Images Plus.

La vista de la costa del mar. Al fondo se ve un pueblo y una pequeña montaña.

Reservas privadas del patrimonio natural: un pilar del movimiento de conservación de tierras privadas en América Latina

Por Hernán Mladinic, Agosto 11, 2026

En las últimas tres décadas, ha surgido en Brasil una fuerza transformadora para la conservación de la naturaleza: los terratenientes privados. El liderazgo del país en la conservación de tierras privadas a través de reservas privadas de patrimonio natural (RPPN) ha dado como resultado uno de los modelos de conservación voluntaria más sólidos y duraderos del mundo. Este enfoque integra los derechos de bienes inmobiliarios con una responsabilidad ecológica perpetua y, ahora, sirve como ejemplo en América Latina y fuera de ella.

Este artículo ofrece un panorama general de la historia, el marco legal, los logros, los desafíos y las oportunidades de las RPPN en Brasil.

De la iniciativa del terrateniente a la política nacional

Las RPPN no se originaron en las oficinas del gobierno, sino en los bosques de propiedad privada de Brasil. Durante las décadas de 1970 y 1980, los terratenientes comprometidos con la conservación, preocupados por la caza furtiva y la tala ilegal, comenzaron a buscar mecanismos legales para proteger sus tierras. Sus esfuerzos finalmente dieron lugar a la primera designación formal de reservas privadas de patrimonio natural (RPPN) creada por el Decreto Federal 98.914 en 1990.

Esta designación se detalló en mayor medida en 1996 y en el 2000, con la promulgación de la Ley 9.985, que estableció el sistema nacional de áreas protegidas de Brasil. La ley reconoce las RPPN como una categoría de áreas protegidas, denominadas en Brasil como unidades de conservación; las define como áreas de propiedad privada protegidas a perpetuidad para conservar la diversidad biológica; y las incorpora al sistema nacional de áreas protegidas.

Una regulación federal posterior, el Decreto 5.746, describe los procedimientos para su establecimiento, así como los derechos y las responsabilidades de los terratenientes, bajo la supervisión de la agencia medioambiental federal de Brasil, el Instituto Chico Mendes para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad.

Perpetuidad y uso restringido

Una característica definitoria de las RPPN es su establecimiento a perpetuidad. Una vez reconocida, una RPPN se inscribe en un registro nacional y se le otorga protección legal permanente que está vinculada a la escritura de la propiedad, al margen de los cambios en la propiedad por venta o herencia. Las RPPN designadas están exentas del Impuesto a la Tierra Rural de Brasil, lo que proporciona un importante incentivo fiscal para los terratenientes. Como Unidades de Protección Integral dentro de las categorías de áreas protegidas de Brasil, las actividades en las RPPN están estrictamente restringidas a las que son compatibles con la conservación, como la investigación científica, la educación medioambiental, el ecoturismo y la recreación.

Durante la década del 2000, varios estados brasileños adoptaron regulaciones para reconocer las RPPN dentro de sus jurisdicciones, y muchos municipios incorporaron incentivos y procedimientos para el reconocimiento local. En 2006, el marco federal para las RPPN se consolidó con la creación del Plan Estratégico Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (PNAP) (Decreto n.º 5.758), que refuerza la función de las RPPN como componentes esenciales de la conectividad del paisaje, los corredores ecológicos y un sistema nacional de áreas protegidas más efectivo y con equidad social. Estos esfuerzos facilitaron una mejor alineación y coordinación de las RPPN entre las redes regionales de terratenientes, las organizaciones de sociedad civil y las autoridades medioambientales en varias escalas.

Una red nacional para las RPPN

Una fuente clave de apoyo y crecimiento para el movimiento de conservación de tierras privadas en Brasil es la Confederación Nacional de Reservas Privadas del Patrimonio Natural (CNRPPN), que reúne a asociaciones de terratenientes, redes regionales y aliados institucionales en todo el país. La CNRPPN desempeña un papel fundamental en la promoción, la asistencia técnica y el desarrollo de capacidades, y brinda apoyo a las reformas regulatorias, los programas de incentivos y los procesos de planificación estratégica para las RPPN.

La CNRPPN alberga información sobre el alcance y la cobertura de las RPPN en todo el país a través del Panel Nacional de RPPN. Este panel, que es el resultado de un esfuerzo colaborativo entre docenas de profesionales y organizaciones dedicadas, hoy es la base de datos más completa sobre RPPN disponible en Brasil. Permite la supervisión de datos en línea, como el número y el área de RPPN por estado, bioma y categoría, así como el aumento de RPPN con el paso del tiempo. Esta infraestructura de datos fortalece la capacidad de promoción de la Confederación, facilita la comunicación con las autoridades públicas y proporciona pruebas concretas del compromiso con los financiadores y los socios internacionales sobre la contribución medible de las RPPN a objetivos como la Meta 3 del Marco Global de Biodiversidad Kunming-Montreal.

Alcance y cobertura

Según el panel, se calcula que hay 1.902 RPPN que protegen alrededor de 837.635 hectáreas (unos 2 millones de acres) en todos los biomas principales de Brasil: el Amazonas, el Cerrado, el Bosque Atlántico, la Caatinga, la Pampa y el Pantanal, con un enfoque estratégico en paisajes fragmentados. En el Bosque Atlántico, donde más del 80 por ciento de la tierra es de propiedad privada, las RPPN funcionan como importantes refugios para las especies endémicas y ayudan a conectar sus hábitats con los fragmentos de bosques públicos. Al funcionar como zonas de amortiguamiento y corredores biológicos, las RPPN demuestran la complementariedad de los esfuerzos públicos y privados para mantener la conectividad y la resiliencia de los ecosistemas más amenazados de Brasil.

La CNRPPN trabaja en estrecha coordinación con el Ministerio de Ambiente y Cambio Climático de Brasil, en particular, con la Secretaría Nacional de Biodiversidad, Bosques y Derechos de los Animales y el Departamento de Áreas Protegidas, que lideran la implementación de la política nacional de biodiversidad y la gestión de áreas protegidas. Esta colaboración intersectorial entre el gobierno, los terratenientes y las organizaciones sin fines de lucro ha permitido que las RPPN se vuelvan una parte fundamental de los esfuerzos de conservación a escala del paisaje.

Crecimiento y sostenibilidad de las RPPN en Brasil

Las RPPN han demostrado ser un mecanismo de conservación con un alto nivel de eficacia en Brasil, pero su crecimiento continuo y la sostenibilidad a largo plazo están lejos de estar garantizados. Los terratenientes asumen el costo total de la administración y la supervisión, incluso con el aumento de las presiones de la expansión agrícola, las interpretaciones cambiantes de la ley medioambiental y los impactos crecientes del cambio climático, como inundaciones e incendios forestales cada vez más graves.

Como respuesta, están surgiendo soluciones. Brasil está promoviendo políticas que permiten que los terratenientes de RPPN reciban una compensación por los servicios ecosistémicos que brindan, incluido el suministro de agua, la captura de carbono y la conservación del hábitat. Al mismo tiempo, están ganando terreno varios enfoques de financiamiento, desde el turismo basado en la naturaleza hasta los mercados de carbono, mediante el aprovechamiento del liderazgo de Brasil en el desarrollo de metodologías para créditos de carbono en reservas privadas. La innovación en las políticas, el financiamiento y la administración están mejorando las condiciones, los incentivos y los resultados para la conservación voluntaria.

Un líder regional en conservación de tierras privadas

La experiencia de Brasil con las RPPN ofrece lecciones valiosas para la conservación de tierras privadas en América Latina y fuera de ella, lo que demuestra que dichas iniciativas tienen éxito cuando los terratenientes motivados cuentan con el apoyo de un marco legal permanente y fuertes redes nacionales y subnacionales que brindan una colaboración estrecha con el sector público.

Mientras la comunidad privada de conservación de tierras de América Latina se prepara para el 14.º congreso en México en 2027, las RPPN de Brasil se erigen como un modelo de cómo las tierras privadas pueden ofrecer una protección duradera de la biodiversidad y contribuir estratégicamente a los objetivos y las metas de conservación de las políticas nacionales e internacionales.


Hernán Mladinic representa a América Latina en el International Land Conservation Network (ILCN) del Instituto Lincoln.

Puede encontrar la versión en inglés de este artículo en el sitio web del ILCN.

Crédito imagen principal: Ciro Couto.

Blog Post

Meet the Author: Building Postcarbon Futures

By Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Agosto 5, 2026

Around the globe, people are transforming their social, ecological, and economic systems in response to the climate crisis. The recently published Building Postcarbon Futures: Land, Justice, and Energy Transitions guides readers through 29 of these exemplary works in a vibrantly illustrated atlas, followed by deep explorations of the issues by more than a dozen leading scholars on the front lines of the climate justice movement.

Don’t miss an opportunity to meet volume editor Billy Fleming, along with select contributing authors and special guests, at Building Postcarbon Futures events around the US in the next few months as they discuss what it will take to build and maintain a more just, regenerative world—and be sure to keep an eye on this space for additional events and event details.

SEPTEMBER 2026

September 9: Boulder, CO
Building Postcarbon Futures: Land, Justice, and Energy Transitions with Billy Fleming
CU Boulder Environmental Design Lecture Series
College of Communication, Media, Design, and Information
1060 18th Street, Boulder, CO 80309
12:00–1:00 p.m.

September 10: Boulder, CO
Book Talk and Community Conversation with Billy Fleming
Trident Booksellers and Cafe
940 Pearl St, Boulder, CO 80302
6:00–7:30 p.m.

September 17: Los Angeles, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Alissa Walker, and Jenny Jones
Presented by L.A. Forum in conjunction with ASLA Conference
Terremoto Office Garden
3618 Pasadena Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90031
5:30–7:30 p.m.

September 23: Climate Week NYC/New York, NY
Architecture, Planning, and International Law: Building Postcarbon Futures
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, Keller Easterling, and Daniel Aldana Cohen
Center for Brooklyn History
128 Pierrepont St, Brooklyn, NY 11201
6:30–8:00 p.m.
RSVP required

September 29: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Akira Drake Rodriguez, and Kimberly Thomas
Temple University Tyler School of Art and Architecture
Atrium Gallery, 2001 N 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122
4:00–5:30 p.m.

OCTOBER 2026

October 1: New York, NY
Radical Gardens: An Ecological and Ever Evolving Design Manifesto
Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum
2 East 91st Street
New York, NY 10128
6:30–8:00 p.m.
Tickets required

October 6: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Nikil Saval
American Grammar Bookstore
2046 N Front St, Philadelphia, PA 19122
6:00–8:00 p.m.

October 15: Philadelphia, PA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Special Guest
WRT
123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1450, Philadelphia, PA 19109
Time TBD

October 26: Ann Arbor, MI
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Shalanda Baker
Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan
Art and Architecture Building
2000 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069
6 p.m.

NOVEMBER 2026

November 18: Miami, FL
Paul J. Cejas Lecture Series
Landscape Architecture + Environmental and Urban Design Department
Florida International University
11200 SW 8th ST, Paul Cejas Architecture Bldg, Miami, Florida 33199
5:00–6:30 p.m.

FEBRUARY 2027

February 22: Berkeley, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming, Daniel Aldana Cohen, and Danielle Rivera
UC Berkeley
230 Bauer Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720-1820
5:00–7:00 p.m.

February 23: San Francisco, CA
A Conversation with Billy Fleming and Special Guest
William Stout Architectural Books
804 Montgomery St, San Francisco, CA 94133
Time TBD

MARCH 2027

March 25: College Park, MD
University of Maryland National Center for Smart Growth
2027 Spring Colloquium Series
Anacostia Building, 1 Physics Ellipse Dr, College Park, MD 20740
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.

 


Lead image credit: Cristian Ordóñez.

Course

Green Home Consumer Lending

Setembro 8, 2026 - Novembro 17, 2026

Online

Oferecido em inglês


This course has been canceled due to low enrollment. 

The Lincoln Institute’s Center for Impact Finance is partnering with Inclusiv to offer Green Home Consumer Lending, an eight-week live virtual course designed to help mission-driven lenders launch and scale their green lending programs.

This course helps lenders design safe, affordable consumer loan products accessible to low- to moderate-income (LMI) households. Participants will explore clean energy technology and energy efficiency fundamentals, program design, regulatory and incentive frameworks, borrower-journey mapping, contractor management, financial sustainability, and partnership strategies.

Who Should Register

The GHCL training is best for lenders, credit unions, and community banks that:

  • Have limited or no green lending program
  • Have staff that can commit 5-8 hours a week to classwork, assignments, and the development of an implementation plan for their financial institution.

We recommend enrolling in teams of two, and that at least one staff member has lending experience.


Palavras-chave

Desenvolvimento Econômico, Meio Ambiente

Housing the World: A World Urban Forum Recap with Anacláudia Rossbach

June 26, 2026

By Anthony Flint, June 26, 2026

Humanity’s essential need for shelter is going unanswered around the globe. An estimated three billion people lack access to housing that is safe, decent, and connected to both jobs and basic services like energy, water and sanitation, according to the United Nations. An estimated 300 million people are currently experiencing homelessness.

“We are at a crossroads,” said UN-Habitat executive director Anacláudia Rossbach, freshly returned from last month’s 13th session of the World Urban Forum in Baku, Azerbaijan, on the latest episode of the Land Matters podcast. If the supply of sustainable housing stock is not increased, said Rossbach, many of the two billion people expected in coming years to migrate to cities—mostly in Asia and Africa—will simply move straight into unplanned informal settlements (colloquially known as slums, favelas, or shantytowns).

At the same time, Rossbach said, the record-breaking 58,000 participants from 176 nations at World Urban Forum 13—the latest convening of the biennial global cities summit that started in 2001—concluded that housing cannot be viewed simply as the construction of homes, but rather as part of an ecosystem connecting with land, infrastructure, transport, public services, and economic opportunity.

Accordingly, the Baku Call to Action recognizes that there are “interconnected pressures including rising costs, land speculation, displacement, imperfect governance systems, and climate impacts”; and that addressing these challenges requires “moving beyond fragmented approaches toward more integrated and people-centered solutions.”

Anaclaudia Rossbach stands in front of a section of white geometric building in Baku, Azerbaijan. She is wearing glasses and has shoulder length gray hair, a gray paisley scarf wrapped around her shoulders, and a blue lanyard.
UN-Habitat Executive Director and former Lincoln Institute of Land Policy program director Anacláudia Rossbach at the site of the World Urban Forum in Baku, Azerbaijan. Credit: UN-Habitat.

 

Enrique Silva, chief program officer at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, and a representative for nonprofit organizations at the World Urban Forum for many years, joined the conversation by pointing out the importance of land in any calculations related to global urbanization.

“We do not connect enough the relationship between land, land use, land policy, and housing as shelter, housing as an economic asset, housing as a dignified vehicle for improving our social and economic mobility,” he said. “A huge portion of the cost of housing, whether it’s a mansion or a shack, is land—the cost of land.”

UN-Habitat also recognizes that housing and climate change are intertwined challenges, calling for climate-smart housing design and alternative, low-carbon building materials, such as cement-free concrete. Cities must consider the carbon footprint of their expansion, said Rossbach—who formerly directed the Latin America and the Caribbean program at the Lincoln Institute—and acknowledge that the poorest populations are generally the most vulnerable to climate impacts such as flooding, mudslides, fires, and extreme heat. “They are on the front lines,” she said.

Reducing emissions and building resilience “is the intersection of how future urban development will take place, how we are going to transform the existing cities, the existing built environments, especially in the Global North, and how we are going to work with this upcoming needs in the Global South, especially in the areas that are highly urbanized,” she said. “How we build our houses, how we transform our built environment, how we address informal settlements, will have a direct relation in terms of climate.”

An aerial photo of Salvador, Brazil is bisected by a curving road, with low-lying informal housing on the left and forested land on the right. In the distance high-rise buildings are visible.
The low-lying houses of an informal settlement in Salvador, Brazil. Credit: Joa_Souza via iStock Unreleased/Getty Images.

 

Lincoln Institute staff were actively engaged at World Urban Forum 13, with Enrique Silva,  Luis Quintanilla, and Darla Munroe serving as panelists and facilitators for sessions on land value capture, affordable housing, slum upgrading and climate action strategies. The multimedia case study video Still the One, chronicling the creation of a pioneering community land trust in Burlington, Vermont, was also shown at the Urban Cinema venue.

The next summit, World Urban Forum 14, is scheduled to be in Mexico City in 2028.

Listen to the show here or subscribe to Land Matters on Apple Podcasts, SpotifyYouTube, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

 


Further Reading

Baku Call to Action Urges Renewed Commitment on the Global Housing Crisis | UN-Habitat News

Lincoln Institute at the Thirteenth Session of the World Urban Forum (WUF13) | Land Wise blog

Solving World’s Housing Crisis Requires More than New Construction | World Resources Institute

Slums are Bearing the Brunt of the Climate Crisis—and Devising Solutions  | Knowable Magazine


Anthony Flint is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, host of the Land Matters podcast, and a contributing editor of Land Lines


Transcript

[00:00:04] Anthony Flint: Welcome to Episode 4 of Season 7 of the Land Matters podcast. I’m your host, Anthony Flint. On this show, we’re going to zoom out for a truly global perspective on cities where nearly two-thirds of the planet’s population reside—technically about 55 percent or 4 billion people as of now, but projected to be 68 percent by 2050. However you look at it, that’s a lot of people needing food, water, shelter, community, and economic opportunity.

Our guest is Anacláudia Rossbach, Executive Director of UN-Habitat, the United Nations agency that runs the World Urban Forum. That’s the biennial global conference on sustainable urbanization, bringing together leaders from all levels of government, urban planners, and nonprofit organizations to address the really big issues facing these cities, and in many cases, huge metropolitan areas.

The World Urban Forum was established in 2001, so it’s a quarter-century-old tradition that’s right alongside the World Economic Forum or the COP, Conference of Parties climate summits. The last World Urban Forum, World Urban Forum 13, was held in May in Baku, Azerbaijan. We’re catching up with Anacláudia to get a recap and understand what the most pressing challenges are, and of course, the collaboration that’s going on to find solutions.

We’re joined by my colleague Enrique Silva, Chief Program Officer at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, and a veteran of many a World Urban Forum. He’s been engaged, among other things, on the role civil society has to play in supporting this rapidly urbanizing planet of ours. Anacláudia, I know it’s been a whirlwind. That may well be a permanent condition for you, but we really appreciate you making time to join the conversation on Land Matters.

[00:02:01] Anacláudia Rossbach: For sure, Anthony. Thank you so much. I’m here because land matters.

[00:02:05] Anthony Flint: The perfect guest! Let’s step back, and if you could provide an overview of World Urban Forum 13 and where it sits, in your view, in the pantheon of these gatherings, and then maybe a little bit about the venue, Baku, and how that was chosen. Tell us about World Urban Forum 13.

[00:02:27] Anacláudia Rossbach: First of all, you mentioned it as being approved by the General Assembly, actually, of the United Nations in 2001, to be a mechanism to engage with stakeholders. It is the primary space that we have at UN-Habitat to liaise with the civil society, with the academia, with local and regional governments, and also even the private sector. This, in Baku, was the 13th edition, and it was record-breaking at many levels.

Perhaps the first is in terms of attendance. It took place at the Olympic Stadium in Baku, which also hosted COP29 back in 2024. We had 58,000 people on the ground with badges. With this number, I think it became the largest UN conference because it was even bigger than the COP. In terms of the broader context, what role it played in terms of really generating change on the ground, because this is what we want at the end of the day, this edition was very strategic because it happened just a couple of months before we meet in New York in July to review SDG 11 and to review the new urban agenda after 10 years.

The new urban agenda is our main document that guides our work. It was endorsed by member states in Quito, Ecuador, in 2016 at the Habitat III conference.

[00:03:53] Anthony Flint: Just let me interject to explain the SDG 11. That’s the Sustainable Development Goal.

[00:03:59] Anacláudia Rossbach: Yes, the sustainable development goals that frame what we call the 2030 agenda. As the name says, 2030 is just around the corner. We have literally four years until the end of this agenda. The United Nations committed to address these sustainable development goals that are related to several aspects of the world we live in, climate being one, but education, health, employment, gender, equality. The SDG 11 is the one that is dedicated to cities and communities. It has to do with housing, informal settlements, land consumption is one aspect, planning, participatory planning, basic services, urban mobility.

What we discussed at the World Urban Forum [is] informing us in this process of going to New York and the assessment of where we are, and to share with member states. The other piece is the new urban agenda that I mentioned before. We are looking at what happened in the last 10 years and what is going to happen in the next 10 years.

One critical aspect of the New Urban Agenda, when it was conceived, was housing. Housing was supposed to be at the center of the New Urban Agenda. Effectively, we are living a global housing crisis. This is why the World Urban Forum brought housing as central theme. Baku was a critical space for us to reflect, to have technical and political discussions on the progress of the new urban agenda, to bring all that to the meeting in New York in July.

[00:05:38] Anthony Flint: Now, I want to ask you more about housing. That was a big theme. I know it’s difficult to summarize, but the declaration on housing, tell us about that, and this re-emphasized focus on housing and basic shelter.

[00:05:53] Anacláudia Rossbach: The Baku call to action is a call to action, as the name says, by stakeholders only. There was no engagement by member states. Stakeholders met, the civil society, the CBOs, the CSOs, the academia, and so on, the different groups, youth, women, persons with disabilities, aging, indigenous. They all met there. The result of their conversations is the Baku call to action, which is a document that is also being brought to New York to inform member states. We need to deal with the housing crisis. It is global.

Informal settlements has been a prevalent form of living, but it is now almost a humanitarian issue because we are stagnated and we might be at the risk of expanding. We have to have a holistic view of the city. We have to go back to the new urban agenda, bring the principles of the new urban agenda of participatory governance, comprehensive urban planning, recognizing that land is fundamental, that land has a social and ecological function, but we need to make sure that people are at the center.

When saying people, it’s people having access to the basics, to water, to electricity, to waste management, integrated to the city, and a roof over their heads. These communities are the frontline, the frontline of climate change, but also human rights violations, evictions, and other forms of issues that are affecting people residing in the most vulnerable spaces in our cities.

[00:07:25] Anthony Flint: Housing is a big issue in the US; affordability, a big issue. It sounds like there’s a more fundamental question of how people can find safe shelter all around the world in these growing cities.

[00:07:40] Anacláudia Rossbach: It is a huge, huge task, and you’re right. Affordability became a global issue. What has been a prevalent feature of the Global South, always the gap between what people’s income and the cost of the house has been always really big. One of the reasons why we have the prevalence of informal settlements because people need to live somewhere, and if they cannot buy a house in the market, if the government doesn’t have money to provide the needed subsidies to cover this gap, they occupy.

Now, it’s an issue in North America. You mentioned the US. It’s an issue in Europe. In Europe, for example, for the first time, the European Union has a dedicated commissioner to housing. For the first time, they have a housing plan. I think the first time after the Marshall Plan, which was actually focused on housing, they have a housing plan for the continent because perhaps there is supply, but there is a mismatch of supply because people cannot access the units at the market, or there is a limitation of supply because the houses have been taken by, for example, tourists in some of the cities that are affected by high levels of tourism, or cities or countries that are attracting retired population, and things like that.

Bottom line, young people, families, they don’t have today the money to buy or to rent a house. In most of the countries, elderly, sometimes they cannot stay where they are, and so they lose their houses. These are all factors that are limiting affordability everywhere.

[00:09:10] Anthony Flint: We will share the declaration about housing in the show notes. I’d like to turn this question over to Enrique with a little commentary. Enrique, if you don’t mind, as a preamble, because you’ve been such a veteran of the World Urban Forum, we noticed that land and land policy is one of the three pillars in the current strategic plan, and we all want to learn more about that. Enrique, may I turn it over to you?

[00:09:37] Enrique Silva: Sure. Thanks so much. First, I want to say how much I’m enjoying, and I appreciate sharing the space with my friend and colleague, Anacláudia, and also to congratulate her and her colleagues for what was, as she noted, an outstanding forum a couple of weeks ago, by all measures. I also want to take a note on the World Urban Forum as a space. I think it’s understated, but the UN-Habitat in creating and offering the World Urban Forum creates probably the singular space for all of us that are interested, care about cities and human settlements to gather and to talk.

Without that space, it’s really hard to think about how we could create a community, even a multidisciplinary, multi-vision on what it means to take care of and advocate for cities. It’s great to see colleagues. It’s great to meet new colleagues and to share the accomplishments that we’re making, but also come together to understand what the challenges are. I also want to congratulate UN-Habitat and Anacláudia’s leadership for not just the forum, but what was behind the forum, as I understand it, is a strategic plan for UN-Habitat that also has housing in the center. That plan offers a systematic way to approach this huge task that we were just talking about.

That, in and of itself, is a contribution. Within that, and now to your question, one of the things that I appreciate and that is innovative about the focus on housing that UN-Habitat is proposing is that it really steps away from housing as pure shelter. It looks at the ecosystem behind housing. It looks at housing from a socioeconomic, cultural perspective. With regards to land, it acknowledges very clearly, and this is important, even though for us in the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, it’s our daily bread, but out in the world, outside of our offices, we do not connect enough the relationship between land, land use, land policy, and housing as shelter, housing as an economic asset, housing as a dignified vehicle for improving our socioeconomic mobility.

That is something that needs to be really celebrated. There’s a space. UN-Habitat, through its plan, through the forum, has given a structured space to understand all of the dimensions of land. In particular, and I think one of the things that we need to look at it in terms of a huge task, is clearly stating that a huge portion of the cost of housing, whether it’s a mansion or a shack, is land, the cost of land.

That forces us to look at what drives the cost of land and how the cost of land affects the availability of land for anyone to put a house on that piece of land. That, for us, is something very important. We are strong allies with UN-Habitat to keep on hammering that message, but also doing the research and demonstrating how the relationship works, and why we need to develop clear strategies, multiple-level strategies, to link the way that we administer and allocate land and how that affects what we could offer as housing.

I’m sure we’re going to talk about informal settlements, but that relationship between land policy, the quality of land, and the availability of land is at the root of the proliferation of informal settlements. My take, and I think the take of many colleagues, if that’s at the root of informal settlements, the solutions to informal settlements also have to go through addressing the role of land.

[00:12:59] Anthony Flint: Anacláudia, do you have anything to add on the matter of land?

[00:13:03] Anacláudia Rossbach: I think in that sense, this … was also unprecedented because we really were able to connect our strategic plan, which has a very sharp focus. It’s access to housing, to land, basic services, the transformation of informal settlements, to the whole structure of the discussion. Of course, we will help the people attending, our people, our staff, but all the partners that attended to come back home with more concrete ideas, insights, and inspiration, and ideas, all that, but concrete examples on how to go back and to implement.

Enrique is right. Land is at the core. The price of land has been impacting all these effects in the market that is generating pressure on affordability. We have to look at that, at the root causes. I’m glad we are partnering with Lincoln to do that. What are the actions? What are the land policies? What are the mechanisms that you can apply at the local level? What are the laws that you need at the national level to help us overcome this challenge?

Also, if we look from the climate lens, which is one of the areas of impact of our strategic plan, and spoiler alert, we are still finalizing our SDG 11 report, but we’re still growing more in territory than in population. Urban sprawl is still bigger than what perhaps we need. This has a strong impact in the environment, in terms of the natural ecosystems, the natural environment, in terms of the infrastructure needed when we sprawl, and the footprint in terms of emissions.

I think at the World Urban Forum, the Baku call to action, we were able to bring all these different perspectives, the economic perspectives of markets, how they’re working, not working, how it’s putting pressure on affordability, how housing is so important for the SDGs, for the socioeconomic challenge that we have, but also the climate perspective. Land is a central aspect of that.

[00:15:00] Anthony Flint: Just following up on land and housing and the issue of informal settlement, you mentioned that we’re still expanding in terms of land at a rate that is a little bit at odds with the actual population, but there’s this sort of spreading out of informal settlement. What is the current view on what to do about that to try to prevent it or curtail it or to work with it in situ that there are improvements that can be made to improve the quality of life in these expanding informal settlements?

[00:15:37] Anacláudia Rossbach: First of all, recognize that they are there because we are talking about 1 billion people. We are at the moment at a crossroad. We have been able to stabilize informality growth in certain regions. However, we have Africa and Southeast Asia receiving about 2 billion people in the next couple of decades, and Latin America also in a crossroads after COVID. In the Global South, we might be at risk of expanding informality if we don’t take action. This is the big picture.

Also, in the Global North, informality also popping up and being recognized. I saw that in Europe. You see vulnerable communities, you have refugees, you have overcrowding. The point is let’s take a picture and let’s recognize they are there, and then having active policies to address that. Understanding that they have been the only option these people found when they moved to a certain city, to a certain metropolitan area.

As I said, they wouldn’t have the money to go to the markets and to a real estate agent and buy a house. The governments wouldn’t have programs that would reach the whole of the population. They go, they find a job, they have aspirations, they go to cities, and they don’t have a place to live. They occupy environmentally protected areas. Sometimes they occupy public land that has been empty or even private land that has been empty.

This is what I mean in terms of recognizing the social function of the land. Many countries, especially in Latin America, they have embedded that in their national legislation. Embedding in the legal regulatory framework that we accept slums are there, informal settlements are there, and the people have the right to stay there and to access services.

Then, of course, from that, embedding in the city planning, from that, making sure that public investments flow into these areas and can generate transformation. Transformation in terms of looking at densities, opening up pathways, roads, looking at drainage solutions, but also looking at public spaces, at green coverage, access to social, to leisure, to cultural amenities, and make sure that these areas are connected up to the city. Embedding in urban planning, embedding in the national development strategies, these are all strategies that we recommend from UN-Habitat.

[00:18:04] Anthony Flint: Enrique, you’ve been tracking this incredibly vast issue of informal settlement for many years. Where do you see things stand at this moment in terms of what most people would say are slums, shantytowns, informal settlement?

[00:18:20] Enrique Silva: I’m glad we’re touching on this subject. It’s one of the things that I appreciated about coming to work at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, in particular, its program in Latin America, which, in many ways, was established a little over 30 years ago to understand the relationship between land policy, land markets, and the proliferation of informal settlements or slums, as some call it.

The argument that we’ve developed over that period is to stop looking at informality as merely an issue of poverty and household low income or resources, and to look at it as fundamentally a failure in local governments or local markets to provide land that is of a quality sufficient enough to sustain everyone’s household shelter needs with dignity. That failure manifests itself in governments for markets not investing in infrastructure, water, electricity, or preparing land that’s close to job markets.

Those are land policy issues and decisions that are both public, also market-driven. For us, land policy tries to intermediate public decisions with market decisions. There, our largest, biggest argument is if you want to prevent informal settlements, the sheltering of people in places that are not recognized by law, talk about climate change, are in place because they’re not recognized by law, in ecologically vulnerable or susceptible places. If you want to prevent those, invest in what we call servicing land, which is ensuring that either the public sector or the market conditions land so that people can have housing.

Do it enough, in the quantity enough, it makes the purchase of the land accessible to more income levels. That’s to prevent it. We still argue that the best way, and as Anacláudia was saying, we have a window of opportunity here to prevent additional informal settlement. A strategy for that—it’s not the only one—a strategy for that is to look at how we can allocate and create service land or offer service lands at an affordable price so that people can buy and settle them into it.

As Anacláudia rightfully says, we have to also, first and foremost, recognize what’s already there because of the failures of the past, and we need to address those. There is a land policy component to regularizing informal settlements. Those tend to be, though, costly, much more complicated because you’re dealing with people’s homes that are already established, communities that have built community and developed extremely healthy social, economic ties.

There are ways to do that. We offer land policy and land-based financing opportunities to finance the regularization of some of these informal settlements. For us, in terms of how to tackle the informal sector, informal housing, it’s everything above. All options are on the table. It’s not just preventative. You have to do both. It’s not just about paying for upgrading, but it’s also looking at the different models to secure tenure of the households there. If and when that land is improved upon, those improvements don’t displace them, which happens often.

[00:21:26] Anthony Flint: We are talking about such big issues, and I want to make the final question about a really big one, and my sympathies for both of you to synthesize this, but that is climate change, both mitigation and resilience efforts, and the issue of climate migration. Anacláudia, what came out of World Urban 13 on the climate front?

[00:21:52] Anacláudia Rossbach: Many things. We have a very strong body of research on climate change. To start with some good news, we launched a publication. We reviewed the Generation 3.0 of the indices, the National Determined Contributions, what we call the national climate implementation plans, let’s say so in a more simple language.

[00:22:13] Anthony Flint: This is each nation’s plan for dealing with climate change?

[00:22:17] Anacláudia Rossbach: Exactly. They have to provide, and there is a third generation now. We used AI to analyze this third generation of reports, and we identified that 80 percent of these reports, they have an urban content, and half of them with some elements around housing and or informal settlements. The importance and the role of cities, of urban climate action, of local action is important to address climate change.

What we discussed, in addition to that, is the role of housing in that space. Cities are responsible for 70 percent of the emissions, and if you look at the built environment, it’s 34 percent. If we look at the city, the majority of the buildings are housing. The way we address housing, the way we address the housing crisis, will have strong implications in terms of climate. Why? Two sides of the coin. Mitigation and adaptation.

Adaptation, we spoke about informal settlements already. These are the people building incrementally, low profile, without sophisticated heating, cooling systems, and so on, very climate-friendly. They’re not contributing much to emissions. However, they are the ones being affected most. They are on the front line. Fires, disasters, landslides, floodings, sea level rise, you name it, they are on the front. Addressing issues, addressing informal settlements, making them stronger, resilient, looking at drainage, looking at protecting them from everything that I’m talking about, improving their housing conditions so that they’re more resilient in terms of disasters, of climate events.

This is an important aspect of this intersection, urban development, cities, informal settlements, housing, and climate change. We have 3 billion people living in inadequate situation right now, 300 million homelessness. We spoke about displacement, 120 million. These are the big numbers that we have. People displaced by conflicts, by climate change, and so on. This is happening as we speak. People are losing their houses. In that sense, housing, if we have to address the needs, we have to, A, either recycle existing buildings or build new ones. Recycling opportunities in the Americas, you’ll find some. In Europe, you’ll find some.

Where urbanization is really happening, in Africa and Southeast Asia, we still need to build because you just don’t have buildings to be recycled. The decisions that we take on how, where, and to whom we build will have an impact because if we don’t focus the upcoming buildings, if we don’t connect to the needs, we might exacerbate a mismatch of supply and demands and have unnecessary emissions.

If we look at location, if we keep up with the urban sprawl, we are, as I said, affecting the natural environments, biodiversity, the natural ecosystems, water. Look at metropolitan areas that are facing drought: Cape Town, Santiago, Bogota. The needs for infrastructure will imply more emissions. People move from place to place. This has impact in terms of air quality, in terms of emissions, et cetera. We have to look at location and we have to look at materials and the form and the design of all that.

Here is the intersection of how future urban development will take place, how we are going to transform the existing cities, the existing built environments, especially in the Global North, and how we are going to work with this upcoming needs in the Global South, especially in the areas that are highly urbanized. How we build our houses, how we transform our built environment, how we address informal settlements will have a direct relation in terms of climate. It’s very interesting that we are talking about that today, Anthony, because as we speak, we are here in Nairobi at a conference meeting the IPCC Cities Report authors.

For the first time, we’re going to have an IPCC Cities Report focus on cities. We have been discussing within these days the role that housing plays. In all conversations that we are having here, we all understand housing is a critical aspect. If we don’t deal with that right, we’ll not be able to achieve the 1.5 or above targets.

[00:26:46] Anthony Flint: Looking ahead, there’s going to be another World Urban Forum, the World Urban Forum 14, as I understand it, in Mexico City in 2028. Anacláudia, a brief look ahead to that gathering.

[00:26:59] Anacláudia Rossbach: First of all, I hope to meet you all in Mexico City in 2028. It will be a critical moment because we are going to follow up on the Baku call to action … housing, land, human rights, all is there. The WUF14 will be used as a moment to reflect what happened and to see how action is really taking place and being implemented. We hope also to have strong mobilization towards WUF14. In this last WUF, we had many innovations. We had a practices hub. We had the WUF Academia.

We are organizing the practices, the different segments into more structured coalitions, communities of practice, way of work. We hope to come stronger as a global, let’s say, coalition in Mexico City, have more allies, bring, because it’s in Latin America, the perspective from the Americas, and experiences from the Americas. Also, we brought in Baku for the first time, very strong, the private sector. This is one segment that needs to be part of the conversation. We hope to elevate that in Mexico City.

[00:28:14] Anthony Flint: Anacláudia Rossbach, Executive Director of UN-Habitat. Enrique Silva, Chief Program Officer at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Thank you so much for joining the conversation at Land Matters.

[00:28:28] Anacláudia Rossbach: Thank you so much. It was a big pleasure to be with my former colleagues, but forever friends. Lincoln is a key stakeholder. We hope to keep our partnership very strong and towards Mexico.

[00:28:39] Enrique Silva: Rest assured, it’s very strong, and it can keep on getting strong. Wonderful to be here. Thank you.

[00:28:44] Anthony Flint: We have extensive research on global urbanization, informal settlement, climate resilience, all of the big issues facing global cities. Just check out our website. It’s lincolninst.edu. On social media, our handle is @landpolicy. I hope you’ll go ahead and rate, share, and subscribe to Land Matters, the podcast of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. For now, I’m Anthony Flint signing off. Until next time.

[00:29:22] [END OF AUDIO]

Read full transcript