Topic: Desarrollo económico

Coming to Terms with Density: An Urban Planning Concept in the Spotlight 

September 15, 2025

By Anthony Flint, September 15, 2025
 

It’s an urban planning concept that sounds extra wonky, but it is critical in any discussion of affordable housing, land use, and real estate development: density.

In this episode of the Land Matters podcast, two practitioners in architecture and urban design shed some light on what density is all about, on the ground, in cities and towns trying to add more housing supply. 

The occasion is the revival of a Lincoln Institute resource called Visualizing Density, which was pushed live this month at lincolninst.edu after extensive renovations and updates. It’s a visual guide to density based on a library of aerial images of buildings, blocks, and neighborhoods taken by photographer Alex Maclean, originally published (and still available) as a book by Julie Campoli. 

It’s a very timely clearinghouse, as communities across the country work to address affordable housing, primarily by reforming zoning and land use regulations to allow more multifamily housing development—generally less pricey than the detached single-family homes that have dominated the landscape. 

Residential density is understood to be the number of homes within a defined area of land, in the US most often expressed as dwelling units per acre. A typical suburban single-family subdivision might be just two units per acre; a more urban neighborhood, like Boston’s Back Bay, has a density of about 60 units per acre. 

Demographic trends suggest that future homeowners and renters will prefer greater density in the form of multifamily housing and mixed-use development, said David Dixon, a vice president at Stantec, a global professional services firm providing sustainable engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting services. Over the next 20 years, the vast majority of households will continue to be professionals without kids, he said, and will not be interested in big detached single-family homes.  

Instead they seek “places to walk to, places to find amenity, places to run into friends, places to enjoy community,” he said. “The number one correlation that you find for folks under the age of 35, which is when most of us move for a job, is not wanting to be auto-dependent. They are flocking to the same mixed-use, walkable, higher-density, amenitized, community-rich places that the housing market wants to build … Demand and imperative have come together. It’s a perfect storm to support density going forward.” 

Tensions often arise, however, when new, higher density is proposed for existing neighborhoods, on vacant lots or other redevelopment sites. Tim Love, principal and founder of the architecture firm Utile, and a professor at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design, said he’s seen the wariness from established residents as he helps cities and towns comply with the MBTA Communities Act, a Massachusetts state law that requires districts near transit stations with an allowable density of 15 units per acre. 

Some towns have rebelled against the law, which is one of several state zoning reform initiatives across the US designed to increase housing supply, ultimately to help bring prices down. 

Many neighbors are skeptical because they associate multifamily density with large apartment buildings of 100 or 200 units, Love said. But most don’t realize there is an array of so-called “gentle density” development opportunities for buildings of 12 to 20 units, that have the potential to blend in more seamlessly with many streetscapes. 

“If we look at the logic of the real estate market, discovering over the last 15, 20 years that the corridor-accessed apartment building at 120 and 200 units-plus optimizes the building code to maximize returns, there is a smaller ‘missing middle’ type that I’ve become maybe a little bit obsessed about, which is the 12-unit single-stair building,” said Love, who conducted a geospatial analysis that revealed 5,000 sites in the Boston area that were perfect for a 12-unit building. 

“Five thousand times twelve is a lot of housing,” Love said. “If we came up with 5,000 sites within walking distance of a transit stop, that’s a pretty good story to get out and a good place to start.” 

Another dilemma of density is that while big increases in multifamily housing supply theoretically should have a downward impact on prices, many individual dense development projects in hot housing markets are often quite expensive. Dixon, who is currently writing a book about density and Main Streets, said the way to combat gentrification associated with density is to require a portion of units to be affordable, and to capture increases in the value of urban land to create more affordability. 

“If we have policies in place so that value doesn’t all go to the [owners of the] underlying land and we can tap those premiums, that is a way to finance affordable housing,” he said. “In other words, when we use density to create places that are more valuable because they can be walkable, mixed-use, lively, community-rich, amenitized, all these good things, we … owe it to ourselves to tap some of that value to create affordability so that everybody can live there.” 

Visualizing Density can be found at the Lincoln Institute website at https://www.lincolninst.edu/data/visualizing-density/. 

Listen to the show here or subscribe to Land Matters on  Apple Podcasts, Spotify,  Stitcher, YouTube, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

 


Further reading 

Visualizing Density | Lincoln Institute

What Does 15 Units Per Acre Look Like? A StoryMap Exploring Street-Level Density | Land Lines

Why We Need Walkable Density for Cities to Thrive | Public Square

The Density Conundrum: Bringing the 15-Minute City to Texas | Urban Land

The Density Dilemma: Appeal and Obstacles for Compact and Transit Oriented Development | Anthony Flint

 


Anthony Flint is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, host of the Land Matters podcast, and a contributing editor of Land Lines. 

Eventos

On Common Ground: Land Policy for Housing and Climate Solutions 

Octubre 7, 2025 - Octubre 9, 2025

Cambridge, MA

Offered in inglés

Cities across the US and the world are grappling with a compounding housing and climate crisis. On October 7–9, 2025, the Lincoln Institute will host a convening to build momentum and foster collaboration between a group of key housing and climate leaders who generally do not work together, but are especially influential on policy and land use reform at different levels of government. The discussion will focus on policy recommendations, collaboration, and opportunities for local, regional, and state action. At the convening, we will share the findings of our initial research, preview a working paper draft, and begin to build a collaborative community of housing and climate leaders who can support local, regional, and state action by helping governments access all levers at their disposal to address housing supply, resiliency and insurability, and climate change.

This event is by invitation only.


Detalles

Fecha(s)
Octubre 7, 2025 - Octubre 9, 2025
Location
Cambridge, MA
Idioma
inglés

Palabras clave

mitigación climática, vivienda

Eventos

National Association for County Community and Economic Development (NACCED) Conference 2025  

Septiembre 8, 2025 - Septiembre 11, 2025

Offered in inglés

The National Association for County Community and Economic Development (NACCED) will host its 50th Annual Educational Conference and Training in Mesa, Arizona, September 8–11, 2025. NACCED is a supporting organization of the National Association of Counties (NACo), which focuses on the county community and economic development profession.

The Lincoln Institute and Claremont Lincoln University will host a booth during the conference, where attendees will be able to see publications and resources, learn about scholarship opportunities for new degree and certificate students, and get more information about the Lincoln Vibrant Communities program.

On September 10, Lincoln Institute President and CEO George McCarthy will give the keynote speech for the conference, titled “Reclaiming Land, Rebuilding Trust: Who Owns the Land and Housing in America’s Counties? Should We Care?” In his address, he will highlight the shift in land and housing ownership happening across the US and will introduce Who Owns America—an innovative tool tracking landownership at the parcel level.

This event is open to NACCED members only.


Detalles

Fecha(s)
Septiembre 8, 2025 - Septiembre 11, 2025
Idioma
inglés

Palabras clave

desarrollo económico, gobierno local

In Denver, Mike Johnston Confronts Success: The City’s Popularity Has Made It Pricey

July 9, 2025

By Anthony Flint, July 9, 2025

 

Mike Johnston, a one-time high school English teacher, has been overseeing a significant boom in one of the most prominent cities in the Intermountain West. Denver has been attracting people and businesses with its temperate climate and outdoorsy quality of life, but this popularity has also caused growing pains, starting with increasingly high housing costs, homelessness, and recently some significant municipal budget woes.

Johnston has tackled the challenges one by one, beginning with a permitting process overhaul, steps to reduce costs in building, and tax abatements and other incentives, like a density bonus, to encourage more construction.

“We have a lot of people that want to move to Denver. That’s driving a lot of economic growth. We’re thrilled about it. It also drives lots of housing demand,” Johnston said in an interview for the Mayor’s Desk series, recorded on the Land Matters podcast. “The overarching theme is, we have to add a lot more housing supply.”

In the wide-ranging interview, Johnston also reflected on his aggressive campaign to clear out homeless encampments in the city. As part of this effort, officials have provided customized relocations to private transitional housing units with services and support for the unhoused.

“When you have high cost of housing cities, you get more people who can’t afford to pay that cost. That is just a mathematical fact. And so that means many of the cities that are growing and are in high demand, like the Denvers, or the San Franciscos, or the Austins, or Seattles, are the places where we see this struggle.”

The strategy of individualized housing solutions, while expensive, has been working, he said. “We think it can work for other cities, and we’ll share these lessons with anyone who’s willing to take them on, because we think we should set the expectation in every American city that street homelessness can be a solvable problem.”

He also expressed confidence that the state and the metropolitan region will have continued success fighting climate change, as federal policy backs away from addressing that global crisis. He said incentives for electrification, electric vehicle infrastructure, and energy-efficiency upgrades like heat pumps are contributing to the city’s goal of being carbon neutral by 2040.

“We don’t want to make it too expensive to do business in Denver, and yet we still want to be aggressively committed to hitting climate goals,” he said. “People do care. And there’s a lot we can do,” such as encouraging residents to take more trips by bike or walking, or to consolidate trips made in single occupancy vehicles.

“We want to encourage people to take more local action now, in the face of federal abandonment of [climate action] … we’ll keep setting our own targets for how our vehicles, our businesses, and our residents try to hit aggressive climate goals, knowing that we’re still all in this together, even if the President doesn’t want to make it a priority.”

Being mayor is the latest step in a professional journey that began with teaching English in the Mississippi Delta. From there, Johnston returned to Colorado to become a school principal, leading three different schools in the Denver Metro area. In 2009 he was elected to the Colorado State Senate, where he served two terms representing Northeast Denver. He was also a senior education advisor to President Obama and CEO of Gary Community Ventures, a philanthropic organization, where he led coalitions to pass the state’s first plan for universal preschool and spearheaded efforts to fund affordable housing and address homelessness statewide. He lives in East Denver with his wife Courtney, who is a chief deputy district attorney, and their three children.

Johnston, 50, was part of the Lincoln Institute mayor’s panel at the American Planning Association’s National Planning Conference in Denver this spring, along with Aaron Brockett and Jeni Arndt, mayors of the Colorado cities of Boulder and Fort Collins, respectively. Senior Fellow Anthony Flint caught up with him several weeks later for this interview, which will also be available in print and online in Land Lines magazine.

Listen to the show here or subscribe to Land Matters on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, YouTube, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

 


Further reading

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston’s latest affordable housing strategy: tax rebates for developers | Denverite

Will Denverites Come Back to the Newly Renovated 16th Street? | 5280

Opinion: Denver Parking Minimums Increase Housing Costs | Westword

Mayor says downtown Denver has made a ‘dramatic change’ | Denverite

Denver City Hall Takes a Page from NASA to Tackle Housing Barriers |  Bloomberg CityLab

Zoning Report: Colorado | National Zoning Atlas

Who Should Pay to Fix the Sidewalk? | Bloomberg CityLab

 


Anthony Flint is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, host of the Land Matters podcast, and a contributing editor of Land Lines.


Transcript

Anthony Flint: Welcome back to land matters, the podcast of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. I’m your host, Anthony Flint. On this show, we’re continuing our Mayor’s Desk series –- our Q&A’s with municipal chief executives from around the world — with Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, who was inaugurated as the 46th mayor of that city pretty much 2 years ago this summer in July 2023. It’s fair to say he’s been overseeing a significant boom in one of the most prominent cities in the Intermountain West, which has been attracting people and business with its temperate climate and outdoorsy quality of life. Yet Denver has had its growing pains, too, with increasingly high housing costs. We see modest bungalows in several neighborhoods in Denver, easily selling for a million dollars or more … a not-unrelated homelessness problem, and recently some significant municipal budget woes.

Mayor Johnson started his career as a high school English teacher in the Mississippi Delta, and returned home to Colorado to become a school principal, leading 3 different schools in the Denver Metro area. He later served as a senior education advisor to President Obama. In 2009 he was elected to the Colorado State Senate, where he served 2 terms representing Northeast Denver, working on issues, including immigration, gun safety and the clean energy transition. He later served as the CEO of Gary Community Ventures, a local philanthropic organization where he led coalitions to pass the State’s 1st plan for universal preschool and spearheaded efforts to fund affordable housing and address homelessness statewide. Mayor Johnston grew up in Colorado, speaks Spanish and lives in East Denver with his wife Courtney, who is a chief deputy district attorney and their 3 kids. Your honor, thank you for joining the conversation at Land Matters, and being part of the Mayor’s Desk series.

Mayor Mike Johnston: I’m delighted to be on. Thank you so much for having me.

Anthony Flint: Well, as I mentioned in the intro, like a lot of booming metropolitan regions, Denver is facing down a housing affordability problem. So, first question, what are the key elements for addressing this crisis?

Mayor Mike Johnston: You bet, Anthony, and again thank you for having me, and I think the opening frame for me which you mentioned … My dad used to say, the only thing worse than being hated is being loved, you know, and what we know for Denver is, we do have folks from all over the country and all over the world who want to move to Denver. And that is a great problem to have. I have friends who are mayors and cities facing very different challenges, which is declining populations and lots of vacant buildings, because people don’t want to move there. Denver is now, I think, the number 2 desired destination for people under age 30 in the United States. And so we have a lot of people that want to move to Denver. That’s driving a lot of economic growth. We’re thrilled about it. It also drives lots of housing demand.

So for us there are three big top priorities here. The overarching theme is, we have to add a lot more housing supply, as you know, but we think there are three ways to do that. One is to make it faster to build housing for us. That means an aggressive strategy on permitting reform to make our permitting system go from what was a two and a half to three-year process to now, what will be a commitment from us to have every permit only take 180 days of time in the city’s hands. We created a new citywide permitting office that unifies all of the functions of permitting that were spread across seven departments, now into one director, who reports directly to me so part of that is making it easier to build in Denver.

The second is reducing the costs of building wherever we can. And so we’re doing that, obviously making the process faster. Reduce the cost. But also we’re doing more to provide our own tax abatements and our own tax programs. We launched a middle class housing strategy this week. That’s focused on providing property tax abatements for up to 10 years in exchange for a 30 year, commitment on deed, restricted affordability for people that are middle class Denverites who need to be able to afford to live in the city. So we think those incentives matter. And then, of course, we are investing more in affordable housing. We know that the city can’t solve this alone, and the market can’t solve it alone. We need a partnership where we will invest city resources into projects where we can be hopefully a smaller and smaller part of the capital stack. But just enough of the stack to be able to buy long-term affordability in the form of deed restrictions. And so for us, it’s making the city build faster. It’s making costs cheaper. And it’s making more public investment with really clear public goals. We’ve set a clear public goal to bring on 3,000 affordable units every year, and provide access for 3,000 households to affordable units every year. That’s about twice the rate what the city was bringing on before we got into office. And so we know we have to be really aggressive about bringing on a lot more housing, a lot more quickly and a lot more affordably.

Anthony Flint: Your campaign to address homeless encampments in Denver triggered a little bit of backlash, including some criticism of the expense. Can you explain your approach, and how it might apply to other cities? And is there anything you would do differently?

Mayor Mike Johnston: Yeah, I think this is one that we are really excited about, because I think many Americans have given into the belief that homelessness is an unsolvable problem that we are just stuck with this as a component of modern life. And, as you said accurately, Anthony, what we know is homelessness exists in the greatest acuity in cities, not because there’s high rates of poverty, not because there’s high rates of unemployment, not because of the political ideology of those cities. It exists in direct correlation to the cost of housing. In those cities. When you have high cost of housing cities, you get more people who can’t afford to pay that cost. That is just a mathematical fact. And so that means many of the cities that are growing and are in high demand, like the Denver’s, or the San Francisco’s, or the Austins, or Seattle’s, are the places where we see this struggle. But what we have really seen is that this is a problem that can be solved by addressing those core needs. And so I’ll lead with the headline that … we set an ambitious goal to try to end street homelessness in my 1st term. Four years. That seems impossible. Well, I’ll tell you, we’re two years in right now, and we have now reduced our street homelessness in Denver by 45% in a little less than two years. That is … the largest reduction of street homelessness in any city in American history, over two years, of which we’re very proud. But it’s also a clear sign that halfway through the term. We’re halfway on the path of that goal. We think other cities should be ambitious. And believing that this is a solvable problem, let me talk about the way we’ve done this, which we think is also really scalable.

What we’ve done is first really focused on bringing on what we call transitional housing units which are dignified, individual private units. A lot of these are hotels we’ve bought and converted. They’re tiny home villages that we’ve built. But critically, it’s not shelter like sleeping on a gym floor with 100 people on a mat. It is a place where you have a locked door. You have privacy, you have access to showers and bathrooms and kitchens. You can store your stuff when you go to work for the day.

And we brought on wraparound services on each of these sites. So our first big effort was to bring on 1,000 units of transitional housing, you know, like many cities, previous Administration fought this battle, and took 2 or 3 years to fight, to put one tiny home village of about 40 units into one neighborhood with a number of lawsuits. We said, we have to bring on units at the scale of the problems. We brought on a thousand units, and (over) six months I did 60 town halls all across the city, talking to neighbors and all of those locations about why this would make such a big difference. We put wraparound services — mental health addiction, support, workforce training, long-term housing navigation — on each of those sites. So people don’t have to always return just to downtown to get those services. And once we brought those units on, then we went geographically to the places where encampments existed in Denver, and instead of sweeping those encampments from block to block, where they just show up in front of someone else’s house or someone else’s church or hospital, we would actually go to those encampments and resolve them. We would close that encampment entirely by moving all 50 people or 100 people. In one case we had almost 200 people in one encampment, closing those encampments, resolving them, moving all those folks into housing, and then importantly keeping that block or that region of the city permanently closed to future camping. So the result is, two years in, we’ve now closed every encampment in the city. We haven’t had a single tent inside of our downtown business district for more than a year and a half we have cut family homelessness by 83%. We’ve become the largest city ever to end street homelessness for veterans. We have no veterans anymore on the streets who can’t get access to housing, and, importantly, anyone can walk down any street or sidewalk or public park, and none of them have tents or encampments in them, so we’ve both made sure there’s a real change in the experience for residents of Denver and those people who are most at risk of starving to death, freezing to death, overdosing on the streets … we moved off of the streets into transitional housing that has really worked for us. We think it can work for other cities, and we’ll share these lessons with anyone who’s willing to take them on, because we think we should set the expectation in every American city that street homelessness can be a solvable problem.

Anthony Flint: Are you satisfied with the number of people using this very impressive and extensive light rail network in Denver Metro, and the number of people living essentially in transit oriented development? Or is the system facing growing pains, and if so, why? A related question … any lessons learned from the relatively light ridership on the free bus on the 16th Street Transit Mall, which is finally concluding its renovation after long delays? But first the light rail network, transit-oriented development … How is it going.

Mayor Mike Johnston: As you, said, Anthony, we’re not satisfied yet, and that is because, as you know, transit and housing have to be connected strategies. Housing is a transit strategy. If you’re mindful about actually building housing and building density of housing around our public transit networks. And so we had this great transit network built. We did not have density of housing around any of those spots. And so what we’re doing now is undertaking a series of very large catalytic investments in a number of areas around the city that are on these light rail lines. So we can build thousands and thousands of units of housing along that corridor. We just, for instance, acquired the largest piece of private property in city history to turn into a public park. It will be a 155-acre park. It is right next to a light rail stop, so we can now add housing and housing density all around that site — beautiful location, and people can get on light rail and get right to downtown or do a Broncos game or anything else. We just won a franchise expansion, the one franchise expansion for the National Women’s Soccer League, and so we’ll have a new women’s soccer franchise. We’re building a new women’s soccer stadium also at a TOD site that we’ll have on that campus … a lot of dense housing commercial activities also connected to public transit. We’re rebuilding our stock show in a historically Latino part of North Denver — Globeville, Elyria, Swansea — that’ll allow us to add about 60 acres of new housing, public spaces, commercial activation also all on public transit. So our belief is, you have to actually be deliberate about building real density around your public transit as much as you want to build your public transit around well traveled lines of travel in the city. And so that’s a big part of our strategy. When we add that density, we know most of the major cities like ours that aren’t yet a New York, or a DC, with a full functioning subway line. You can’t just throw in that infrastructure and hope the city accommodates because people have lots of places to go to. You have to build nodes of real density around the city. So even though you might have 3 or 4 different jobs over the next 10 years, those jobs can be concentrated among different regions, and your housing can, and your activities can (as well). So that’s our big strategy around that. And you’ll see us make historic investments in doing that in the next couple of years.

But a part of that is downtown, is our downtown strategy. And you mentioned our 16th Street bus that we have, that’s free downtown. We’re making the largest investment in our downtown, also of any city in the country, per capita. Right now, about $600 million through a tax increment financing system that will focus on one getting more people to live downtown. We want downtown to be a neighborhood, not just a business district. And so we’re going to add about 4,000 units of housing in our city center, using these funds that we have from our downtown Denver authority, because we know that means more people that will use that bus every day that we’ll get to and from work they will go to see friends. So that’s a big part of our strategy. We’re working on filling up about 7 million square feet of vacant office space — like many cities, have about 4 million of that, we will use with residential conversion. We think one of the most ambitious residential conversion plans in the country. The other 3 million we’ll use by bringing people back to the office, recruiting businesses to come downtown, stay downtown, we think the more we activate that location the more folks will use the public transit, and the more people can use the connected public transit of coming from a neighborhood in East Denver or North Denver, take the light rail down to downtown, use the 16th Street ride to get up and down 16th Street … we have the second largest theater complex in the country off of Broadway. We have 5 professional sports franchises in our city center. We have Michelin Star restaurants. We’ll have the Sundance film festival coming to Colorado. There’s so much to be attracted to seeing. We want to make it easy to get to downtown and around downtown, and this will do that.

Anthony Flint: Given the current municipal fiscal challenges in Denver, what is your thinking about alternative financing systems such as a land value tax or value capture, as seen in the 38th & Blake incentive overlay? I’m hoping you might explain the concept as you see it and how or whether its rationale makes sense to you.

Mayor Mike Johnston: We are interested in every incentive we can find to encourage folks to build more housing. The 38th and Blake overlay was really kind of a density bonus, where we allow folks to build higher buildings than what the zoning might allow in exchange for adding more affordable housing, and we are always looking at ways to incentivize folks to add more affordable housing. So we’re delighted to do that. I think that also links to the program I described briefly which is our our middle class housing program we launched yesterday, which is also focused on a property tax abatement. We’ll offer up to 10 years of property tax abatement for people that are going to build middle class affordable housing. So think about that as people making sixty to a hundred thousand a year as an individual … and that’s about a 10 year property tax abatement for a 30-year commitment of affordability. So that’s a great deal for us. We’re also looking at partnership on places where we have public land. We’re looking at working with city-owned land, working with Denver public schools where they have land, our regional transit system, if they have land. And so we’re always looking to contribute public land as a way to incentivize more affordability. But we want to do a all of the above strategy. But wherever we can add more housing without having to invest more dollars in these fiscal times that’s a big help

[Re-stated] Our belief is we want to do an all of the above strategy on every way we can incentivize people to build more affordable housing. So for us, that means we want to use city land. Whenever we can do that, we’ll use public land to be able to incentivize a deal. We’ll partner with other public agencies like the Denver public schools, or like the regional transit system or the State. That’s always a great way for us to incentivize. And that’s why we’ve used strategies like this middle class housing program we launched, which is a property tax abatement where folks can get 10 years of property tax abatement for a 30 year, commitment of deed, restricted affordability through a special limited partnership. So we’re going to use every strategy we have, particularly in tough economic times, and you don’t have big new dollars to invest in supporting affordable housing. We have to find other creative ways and density. Bonuses are a great way, and we’ll keep doing that as well as everything else we can.

Anthony Flint: Finally, how would you assess the progress of your climate action plans which I see includes incentives for electrification, electric vehicle infrastructure, hot and cold weather heat pumps, energy efficiency … Do you see a tangible embrace at the local level for addressing climate change, especially in the context of retrenchment at the federal level. I mean, just as a practical matter, the federal government is getting out of the climate business. So can cities and states take that over and be effective?

Mayor Mike Johnston: We don’t see any change at all in our city’s commitment to climate action or our conviction that this is a still existentially important effort for us to undertake. And so we are not slowing down at all. We’re not changing our path, and what we are doing is trying to make sure we’re committed to an aggressive vision to meet our climate goals, which for us is a 2040 plan to be entirely carbon free by 2040, to have 100% renewable energy. And also to make sure we’re driving economic growth. We want to do both. And so we don’t want to make it too expensive to do business in Denver, and yet we still want to be aggressively committed to hitting climate goals. And we’re doing that. We’ve done things like we had, I think, one of the nation-leading efforts on making our commercial buildings more energy efficient through a program we have called Energize Denver. We also had concerns from the business community about how to comply with the cost to make those adjustments to buildings. And so we spent a lot of time with our landowners and building owners and business leaders, and we revised that plan to both decrease the penalties, extend the amount of time folks can comply, put a cap on the overall amount of changes they have to make, which drops the cost dramatically for our business partners, but still keeps us on path to hit aggressive 2040 climate goals. So people do care. And there’s a lot we can do. There’s behavior change. We’re doing a whole campaign on behavior change, to encourage folks to take more trips by bike or walking … Can they consolidate or condense the number of single occupancy vehicle trips that they take. And so part of it is about awareness. Part of it’s about behavior change and part of it’s about a good policy on things like banning plastic bags. Obviously, and being able to incentivize more and more solar and wind. So we think this is purely a part of Denver’s brand. We want to be able to be a great city and a good city. We want to be able to have a great economy, and also have great connection to the natural environment of the outdoors. And so for us, it’s it’s good climate and good business, and we’ll continue to do both.

Anthony Flint: And local and state government taking this over, are you optimistic about that? The question is, can they really take this over, a planet-wide issue, and really be effective.

Mayor Mike Johnston: I think we don’t believe that we should give up here or step away. Our campaign, we call, do more or do less, but do something, whether it’s going to do more in the way of recycling, or less in the way of using a single occupancy vehicle or doing something in terms of being able to make decisions about where and how you use energy. We want to encourage people to take more local action now, in the face of federal abandonment of this. The things that we’ll need help on are the things that made a big difference. The federal tax credits on electrical vehicle purchases — those are big drivers of behavior change. I sponsored when I was in the Senate a state credit that does the same thing — provide incentives, tax incentives for electric vehicle purchases. Here we’re building out aggressively, charging station infrastructure to make it easier for us to convert our fleet vehicles to be electric to get more Ubers and Lyfts and Fedexes and Amazons and UPS (vehicles) to do the same. And to convince regular residents do the same. So we’ll keep building the infrastructure to do this. We’ll keep incentivizing people to do it. We’ll keep changing behavior to do it, and we’ll keep setting our own targets for how our vehicles, our businesses, and our residents try to hit aggressive climate goals, knowing that we’re still all in this together, even if the President doesn’t want to make it a priority.

Anthony Flint: Mike Johnston, Mayor of Denver, Colorado. Thank you once again for this conversation.

Mayor Mike Johnston: Thanks so much for having me, Anthony. It’s great to meet you.

Anthony Flint: You can learn more about all the issues we covered — strategies for affordable housing, sustainable urbanism, transit-oriented development, value capture, and of course, the challenge of climate change, pursuing both mitigation and resilience — all of that and more at the Lincoln Institute website, www.lincolninst.edu. While you’re there, scroll to the bottom and join our mailing list to get periodic updates on our work. And also on social media, the handle is @landpolicy. Finally, don’t forget to rate, share and subscribe to the Land Matters podcast. For now, I’m Anthony Flint, signing off until next time.

Read full transcript
Mayor Brett Smiley leans on a metal railing. Part of the Providence skyline is visible in the background.
El escritorio del alcalde

Ciudad pequeña, cambios grandes 

Por Anthony Flint, Abril 16, 2025

Como 39.º alcalde de Providence, Rhode Island, Brett Smiley aborda la seguridad pública, la vivienda asequible, la educación y la resiliencia ante el cambio climático. Antes de ser elegido en 2022, Smiley, quien nació y creció en el área de Chicago y se mudó a Rhode Island para trabajar en política en 2006, fue jefe del Departamento de Administración del estado, director ejecutivo de operaciones de Providence y jefe de personal de la exgobernadora de Rhode Island, Gina Raimondo.

Con una población de alrededor de 191.000 habitantes, Providence es la tercera ciudad más grande en Nueva Inglaterra después de Boston y Worcester, Massachusetts. Esta ciudad, que alguna vez albergó una gran cantidad de fábricas y molinos, en los últimos años se hizo conocida por adoptar el nuevo urbanismo, la preservación histórica y la reutilización adaptativa, así como por sus innovaciones culinarias, culturales y artísticas.

Anthony Flint entrevistó al alcalde Smiley esta primavera en el ayuntamiento. Escuche la conversación completa, que aquí se editó por motivos de longitud y claridad, en el pódcast Land Matters.

 

El horizonte de la ciudad de Providence. Al fondo se ven edificios altos, con la Casa del Estado de Rhode Island a la derecha. Al frente hay casas multifamiliares cerca de una carretera por la que transitan algunos automóviles. Árboles se encuentran dispersos por toda la ciudad, particularmente en el área entre los edificios más altos del fondo y las casas multifamiliares.
La ciudad postindustrial de Providence ha visto crecimiento en población y en ingreso familiar en los últimos años, gracias en parte a una afluencia de residentes con trabajos híbridos o remotos en otras partes. Crédito: Alex Potemkin vía iStock/Getty Images Plus.

 

Anthony Flint: El arco narrativo de Providence en los últimos 30 años ha sido notable: una ciudad secundaria recuperada del estancamiento económico mediante el desmantelamiento de carreteras, la iluminación de los ríos y el foco en el diseño urbano. Ahora hay preocupaciones sobre la capacidad de pago, comenzando por la vivienda. ¿Hacia dónde se dirige la ciudad ahora?

Brett Smiley: Le agradezco que haya mencionado el notable progreso que ha tenido la ciudad. Hemos recorrido un largo camino, y mientras muchas ciudades postindustriales continúan luchando, Providence está en una trayectoria muy diferente. Gracias a la pandemia, tuvimos una afluencia de personas que comenzaron a reclamar servicios urbanos, arte, cultura, diversidad y transitabilidad a pie, sin que eso conlleve la cantidad de esfuerzo y dinero que implica vivir en Manhattan o Brooklyn, o incluso en Boston.

Uno de los puntos competitivos de la ciudad es que era menos costosa. Pero no pudimos seguir el ritmo desde la construcción y, como resultado, los precios de la vivienda se están disparando. Estamos entre las cinco primeras ciudades en cuanto a afluencia migratoria neta, pero estamos en el puesto 50 de 50 en cuanto a nuevas construcciones de viviendas. Nuestra tarea es facilitar una construcción más densa en el contexto mundial en el que nos encontramos, lo que significa incorporar infraestructura verde para prepararse para el cambio climático y, al mismo tiempo, permitir un mayor crecimiento.

Creemos que podemos liderar el camino para lograr ambos objetivos. Es un momento emocionante para la ciudad. No nos cuesta promocionar Providence. Lo que nos cuesta es asegurarnos de que haya una vivienda disponible para todos los que quieran una.

AF: Hay muchos terrenos vacíos en los que se puede construir, incluidos algunos estacionamientos. Hay lugares que no requieren derribar nada.

BS: Tenemos muchos lugares en donde construir. Uno de nuestros desafíos económicos siempre ha sido que, desde una perspectiva de costos, estamos en el mismo mercado económico que Boston; sin embargo, nuestros alquileres o precios de venta son mucho menores que los de Boston. Tenemos un vacío que llenar en términos del precio que la unidad de vivienda puede exigir y el costo que se necesita para construirla . . . es por eso que estamos trabajando mucho en medidas como incentivos por aumentar la densidad y la flexibilización de los requisitos mínimos de estacionamiento. De esta forma permitimos que los emprendedores inmobiliarios ayuden a que los proyectos sean más viables en cuanto al financiamiento. Además, analizamos algunas soluciones innovadoras que las ciudades de todo el país están probando, como cambios en el código de incendios y otras cuestiones que reducirán el costo de construcción mediante la flexibilización de algunos de los requisitos reglamentarios.

AF: A diferencia de los alcaldes de Boston o París, no ha estado tan entusiasmado con el concepto de calles completas con carriles para peatones, bicicletas y autobuses. ¿Cómo ha evolucionado su forma de pensar?

BS: Sabemos que solo entre el 2 y el 4 por ciento de la población va al trabajo en bicicleta. Aspiramos a duplicar o cuadruplicar ese número. Y, aun así, menos del 10 por ciento de las personas viajarían al trabajo en bicicleta. Queremos que más personas elijan la bicicleta como un medio de transporte alternativo, pero estamos hablando del 5 por ciento de las personas que viajan al trabajo, no del 75 por ciento, aunque a veces se sienta así. Trato de dedicar tiempo y recursos a los medios y métodos de transporte que la mayoría de la gente usa de verdad.

AF: ¿Puede hablar sobre el desafío de retener a los principales empleadores, como el fabricante de juguetes Hasbro, y la práctica de ofrecer beneficios como exenciones fiscales para el desarrollo económico?

BS: Las tácticas para el desarrollo económico han cambiado. El crecimiento significativo que hemos visto en la última década, y en particular desde la pandemia, es que las personas se mudan aquí con buenos trabajos que se encuentran en otro lugar, o directamente en ningún lugar. La forma de pensar en el desarrollo económico ha cambiado, por eso es que la vivienda es una de mis prioridades, porque la vivienda es, de hecho, una estrategia de desarrollo económico.

Sin embargo, los principales empleadores con sede en la ciudad siguen siendo importantes. Las empresas que la gente conoce pueden ser muy relevantes para las perspectivas económicas de la ciudad y su marca, si se quiere. También es valioso asegurarse de que haya una comunidad corporativa central que ayude a apoyar y sostener a las instituciones cívicas, las organizaciones artísticas y otros grupos que dependen del apoyo filantrópico corporativo.

AF: En un estudio reciente, se observó que la vida nocturna de Providence genera casi 1.000 millones de dólares al año en actividad económica, pero se señaló que muchos trabajadores no pueden tomar un autobús para ir a su casa después de que cierran los bares y restaurantes. Ya que carece de un tren o metro ligero, ¿qué puede hacer Providence para mejorar el transporte público?

BS: Es importante que hablemos de la vida durante la noche en general, no solo de la vida nocturna como un entretenimiento. Hay miles de empleados que trabajan durante lo que denominamos “el otro turno de nueve a cinco”: 21:00 a 5:00. Es decir que no solo hablamos de restaurantes, hospitalidad y clubes nocturnos, sino también de las personas que trabajan en el turno noche en un hospital y otros trabajos similares.

No tenemos un sistema de tren o metro ligero aquí en Providence, ni en ningún otro lugar de Rhode Island. Tenemos un sistema de autobuses que funciona bastante bien durante el día, pero es menos frecuente o, en el caso de algunas líneas, deja de funcionar tarde por la noche. Las soluciones son buscar otros medios de transporte, como viajes compartidos y micromovilidad, y que nuestro sistema de autobuses, RIPTA, brinde un mejor servicio a estos grandes centros de empleo. No necesitamos innovaciones de vanguardia. Solo tenemos que pensar en la prestación de servicios para este período que, a menudo, se pasa por alto y se olvida.

 

Una parada de autobús de la Autoridad del Transporte Público de Rhode Island (RIPTA, por su sigla en inglés) en la Casa del Estado en Providence. Crédito: Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current.

 

AF: Dada la experiencia de tener que cerrar un puente importante debido a problemas de integridad estructural, ¿qué piensa sobre la inversión en infraestructura, en particular ahora que las ciudades se podrían enfrentar a un marco diferente del gobierno federal?

BS: Parte de la historia del Puente de Washington en la I-95, que es una arteria importante aquí en la ciudad, es que es un puente de propiedad estatal y un proyecto financiado por el Departamento de Transporte de Rhode Island, que no tuvo el mantenimiento adecuado. La lección que saco de eso es la importancia del mantenimiento continuo para evitar un precio mucho más alto por tener que reemplazarlo. Necesitamos asegurarnos de que todos nos ocupamos de esta infraestructura, en especial después de cuatro años de inversión importante en algunos grandes proyectos de infraestructura aquí en la ciudad y en todo el país. En segundo lugar, necesitamos ingresos predecibles [como las tarifas de los peajes para camiones pesados] para poder pagar estos proyectos. Puedes reparar algo hoy o reemplazarlo mañana, pero el reemplazo siempre es la peor inversión.

AF: Del mismo modo, ¿le preocupa la situación de las instituciones ancla de educación y salud, que siguen siendo un componente clave del renacimiento de Providence, ante las interrupciones en el financiamiento federal?

BS: Estoy muy preocupado por la estabilidad financiera de la educación y la salud. El cambio de la recuperación de costos indirectos para las subvenciones de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud (NIH, por su sigla en inglés) ya está afectando a Providence. Tanto nuestros hospitales como nuestra principal institución de investigación, que es la Universidad de Brown, dependen de esos fondos. Cambiar las reglas a mitad de camino es muy perjudicial.

Los mayores empleadores de la ciudad son el hospital y las facultades. Estos recortes afectarán a nuestra comunidad de una manera u otra, ya sea por la pérdida de empleos, la disminución de los valores inmobiliarios o la menor inversión. Además de todas las oportunidades que podrían no darse como resultado de esto: curas para enfermedades que pueden no descubrirse y soluciones a problemas reales de las que ninguno de nosotros se beneficiaría, si la investigación nunca sucede. Es un problema serio y una verdadera vergüenza. No es forma de tratar a socios importantes.

AF: Usted es un tipo de político diferente en comparación con algunos dirigentes anteriores de Rhode Island que podrían describirse como más de la vieja escuela. ¿Cómo se calificaría en términos de participación con los constituyentes? En una entrevista reciente, dijo: “Hay momentos en que los dirigentes públicos necesitan decir ‘basta, ya hemos escuchado suficiente. Esto es lo que haremos’”.

BS: Suelo abordar los problemas desde dos enfoques: uno relacionado con las prioridades y otro con el estilo. Con respecto a las prioridades, el difunto alcalde de Boston, Tom Menino, a quien no conocí, hablaba de ser un mecánico urbano, [y esa] siempre ha sido una frase con la que me identifico. He tratado de establecer mis prioridades en temas centrales de calidad de vida, cuestiones que afectan la vida cotidiana de las personas, para tratar de mejorarla. Intento solucionar los problemas que en verdad les importan a las personas.

Creo que habrá una gran erosión en la confianza en el gobierno en general. El antídoto para eso es mostrar competencia, eficiencia y eficacia, en particular a nivel local, porque nuestros residentes nos conocen por nuestros nombres. No les avergüenza decirnos lo que creen que no está funcionando. Trato de mantenerme enfocado en esas cuestiones y no en resolver todos los problemas del mundo, sino en resolver los problemas de un vecindario.

En términos de estilo, soy una persona bastante discreta y no tengo altas expectativas, no soy grandilocuente, trato de escuchar a la gente. Estamos muy comprometidos con la comunidad. Tratamos de involucrar a la comunidad de nuevas maneras [como usar Zoom y encuestas en línea]. Pero llega un momento en que el líder debe tomar una decisión y seguir adelante. Para eso me eligieron. Volveré a estar en la boleta el próximo año. Si a los votantes de Providence no les gusta, pueden elegir a otra persona.

Siento que es mi trabajo decir: “De acuerdo, hemos escuchado los comentarios de todos. Hicimos modificaciones donde fue necesario. Podemos estar de acuerdo en no estar de acuerdo en otras cuestiones. Esto es lo que haremos en el futuro y el día de la rendición de cuentas será el día de las elecciones”. Me siento muy cómodo con eso. Creo que eso es lo que se necesita para pasar a la acción.

Eso es lo que creo que nuestros residentes quieren que hagamos: pasar a la acción. La inacción es el enemigo del progreso. Es algo de lo que no quiero ser víctima.


 

Anthony Flint es miembro sénior del Instituto Lincoln de Políticas de Suelo, conduce el ciclo de pódcast Land Matters y es editor colaborador de Land Lines.

Imagen principal: Alcalde Brett Smiley. Crédito: Ciudad de Providence.

 

Eventos

Accelerating Community Investment (ACI) Lab Atlanta

Junio 3, 2025 - Junio 5, 2025

Offered in inglés

The Lincoln Institute’s Accelerating Community Investment (ACI) initiative is partnering with the City of Atlanta to host an ACI Lab to explore innovative policy and financing solutions for increasing access to starter homes in Atlanta. This forum is aimed at sharing current challenges and initiatives, highlighting emerging models, and engaging participants in collaborative problem-solving to redefine the “starter home” for a post-COVID urban context. The event brings together policymakers, public finance professionals, urban developers, community organizations, and impact investors engaged in affordable housing locally in Atlanta and nationally through the ACI community of practice.

This event is by invitation only.


Detalles

Fecha(s)
Junio 3, 2025 - Junio 5, 2025
Idioma
inglés

Palabras clave

desarrollo económico

The Lincoln Vibrant Communities Fellows Program, March 2026

Fecha límite para postular: March 3, 2026 at 11:59 PM

The Lincoln Vibrant Communities Fellows Program is a 24-week program designed to build capacity to address challenges in communities using the best practices, tools, and research of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and the academic excellence of Claremont Lincoln University. This collaborative program offers graduate-level education, expert connection, and peer networking to support public and private sector leaders in advancing sustainable community development. 

Participants will engage in immersive in-person education; an online leadership curriculum; and specialized coursework covering concepts such as scenario planning, data visualization, strategic communication, conflict mediation, and policy development. The program culminates in a nine-credit graduate certificate in Advanced Public Sector Leadership, providing a pathway for further academic and professional growth. 

Through applied learning, expert-led discussions, and collaboration, fellows will develop innovative solutions to enhance resilience and lead impactful change. Graduates join a national network of leaders dedicated to fostering sustainable, engaged communities. 

The online application form will open on January 7, 2026. Applications are due by March 3, 2026. The program begins on March 18, 2026, in Chicago, IL. 


Detalles

Fecha límite para postular
March 3, 2026 at 11:59 PM

Palabras clave

desarrollo económico, gobierno local, planificación