• At Lincoln House Blog
  • Pressroom / Information Center
  • Calendar
  • Register
  • Login
  • Shopping Cart
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  • Quick Links
    • At Lincoln House Blog
    • Find an Expert
    • Latest Policy Focus Report
    • Online Education
    • Lectures & Videos
    • Resources & Tools
  • Departments & Programs
    • Planning and Urban Form
    • Valuation and Taxation
    • International Studies
    • China Program
    • Latin America Program

Español | 中文

  • About
  • News & Events
  • Education & Research
  • Publications & Multimedia
  • Resources & Tools
    • Links
    • Databases
    • Planning and Management
    • Tax Tools
    • Visualizing
Visualizing Visualizing Density Visual Tools for Planners Visioning and Visualization
Property Valuation and Taxation Library Property Tax in Latin America Significant Features of the Property Tax
Community Land Trusts Managing State Trust Lands Regional Collaboration Resolving Land Use Disputes Teaching Fiscal Dimensions of Planning
Land and Property Values in the U.S. Significant Features of the Property Tax University Real Estate Development Atlas of Urban Expansion

Visual Tools for Planners Providing planners with tools for communicating planning ideas

Visual Tools for Planners Home
Visual Tools Planning Timeline Business Movement Scenario Planning
Sources
Handbook (PDF)
Tutorial (PDF)
Links
Contact
In Partnership with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Visual Tools

go to search panel

Scenario Planning

Click image to view details (PDF 3.56 MB)

Scenario Planning: The Atchafalaya Basin

Graphics

The graphics in this presentation demonstrate techniques for presenting scenarios to people interested in the future of a region (in this case, private developers interested in southern Louisiana). Since this presentation will not be presented orally—but rather put on a website for viewing—the format is different from many PowerPoint presentations. Usually, short phrases or labels organized by bullet points would be used, reducing clutter on the screen and allowing the presenter to expand upon each point. In this case, there is more text to explain each point thoroughly because there is no presenter to do so.

Graphics are used throughout the presentation to help the viewer visualize the concepts being presented. Most of the graphics consist of simple base maps overlaid by shapes and text that outline areas of interest. These graphics are not meant to show detailed information, but rather to outline broad concepts and translate scenarios from text to map. Each graphic is tailored to make a specific point that is mentioned on that particular slide; the cross-section drawing showing elevations of features in New Orleans is a good example of this. When it is important to see more detail on a map, USGS topography maps were used as base maps to help the user identify specific places, natural features, and infrastructure. This is particularly important in the three scenario maps for port development on the Atchafalaya River at the end of the presentation. Here, it is important to note existing settlement patterns, infrastructure, and terrain. But even in these maps, the shapes are not meant to show definite boundaries, but rather to suggest general locations. The only map that requires a greater level of detail is the overview map of the Old River Control Structure. In this graphic, the features of the entire complex are highlighted, allowing the viewer to see how the structure works. A USGS aerial photo (with added color) was used as the base map for this graphic.

For this presentation, data-intensive thematic maps were not necessary or desired to achieve the purpose of the presentation—to outline scenarios and provide examples of possible planning tasks. However, interested parties would likely conduct more in-depth research in the future that expands on the information presented here.

Explanation

This presentation is an adaptation of a team project for the “Frameworks and Methods: Evaluation” class in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the Spring of 2006. The presentation demonstrates how creating scenarios can help planners think about future possibilities and the wide-ranging implications of certain events. Examining possible scenarios can also suggest ways to prepare for the future, make wiser investments, and mitigate damage from future disasters.

The goal of this presentation was to make recommendations to a fictional development firm that is contemplating where to invest resources for future development in southern Louisiana. The issues are examined in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita that devastated the region in August and September of 2005. With these events in mind, the strengths and vulnerabilities of the region are explored based on the actions of various important players, including nature itself. This analysis briefly examines the future of New Orleans and surrounding cities following Hurricane Katrina and the implications this has on population, housing, business, and port development throughout the region. The events of Galveston and Houston in 1900 serve as an example of what may occur.

The ultimate scenarios and recommendations of the report center around possibilities of future port development in the Atchafalaya Basin if the Old River Control Structure were to fail and send the waters of the Mississippi River down the Atchafalaya to the Gulf of Mexico. If this were to occur, the Atchafalaya River would become the dominant river in southern Louisiana and the current Mississippi passage would be little more than a saltwater estuary of the Gulf of Mexico, making transportation and large-scale development difficult in Baton Rouge and New Orleans. A private developer—among many other parties—would be interested to know where new ports and other development would be most likely to occur. This presentation outlines these possibilities and points the developer toward additional research and investment decisions.

An example of scenario planning based on the possibility of a change in course of the Mississippi River to the Atchafalaya Basin

Sources



© 2013 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 113 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-3400 USA Home Contact Help Privacy