• At Lincoln House Blog
  • Pressroom / Information Center
  • Calendar
  • Register
  • Login
  • Shopping Cart
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  • Quick Links
    • At Lincoln House Blog
    • Find an Expert
    • Latest Policy Focus Report
    • Online Education
    • Lectures & Videos
    • Resources & Tools
  • Departments & Programs
    • Planning and Urban Form
    • Valuation and Taxation
    • International Studies
    • China Program
    • Latin America Program

Español | 中文

  • About
  • News & Events
  • Education & Research
  • Publications & Multimedia
  • Resources & Tools
    • Links
    • Databases
    • Planning and Management
    • Tax Tools
    • Visualizing
Visualizing Visualizing Density Visual Tools for Planners Visioning and Visualization
Property Valuation and Taxation Library Property Tax in Latin America Significant Features of the Property Tax
Community Land Trusts Managing State Trust Lands Regional Collaboration Resolving Land Use Disputes Teaching Fiscal Dimensions of Planning
Land and Property Values in the U.S. Significant Features of the Property Tax University Real Estate Development Atlas of Urban Expansion

Visioning and Visualization Resources for visually understanding planning

Visioning and Visualization Home
Gathering Ideas
Focus Groups
Where Do We Grow?
The Base Maps
How Do We Grow?
Development Principles Growth Opportunity Areas Alternative Density Scenarios Building Blocks
A Vision for Kona

Building Blocks

A total of 17 visual simulations – building blocks – were created to illustrate possible conditions likely to be created under the average 5 to 8 net units per acre in preferred scenario and a continuum of conditions from neighborhoods to village centers. They were also created to address residents’ concerns about uniformity and scale. The building blocks, based on Kona building types, were presented and rated during the Open House segment of the second charrette.

A visual simulation of a pedestrian-oriented village center building block with parking predominately behind the buildings.

The results of the rating exercises indicated a preference for communities with well-defined centers that have parking in the back and create a walkable and social environment. They indicate a preference for neighborhoods that offer varied housing types, setbacks, and lots while they express a dislike for conditions associated with conventional subdivision developments, e.g. uniform lots and housing sizes and lack of sidewalks. (See figures below.) The building blocks, based on the public’s preferences, informed the creation of a prototypical neighborhood.

A visual simulation of a conventional subdivision development with uniform housing sizes, types, and setbacks. This typical development type includes front-loaded garages and numerous curb cuts.

A visual simulation showing a variety of housing types, sizes, and setbacks. Garages and small ohana houses (flats for extended family) are in the rear yards and are accessed via alleys and pathways.

The responses to the building blocks provide critical information to be used in the development of regulatory tools to implement the compact neighborhoods and village vision expressed through the preferred development scenario. In addition, the building blocks were used to analyze the physical implications of density bonuses in the range of 20 to 30 percent for the provision of affordable housing.


© 2013 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 113 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-3400 USA Home Contact Help Privacy