At Lincoln House Weblog Pressroom / Information Center Contact Calendar My Profile Help Log In
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Quick Links  
At Lincoln House weblog Find an Expert Latest Policy Focus Report Online Education Lectures Lincoln Institute in the News
go advanced
search
International Studies Valuation & Taxation Planning & Urban Form

About News & Events Education & Research Publications & Multimedia Resources & Tools
Visualizing Tax Tools Planning and Management Databases Links
Visualizing Visualizing Density Visual Tools for Planners Visioning and Visualization
Property Valuation and Taxation Library Property Tax in Latin America Significant Features of the Property Tax
Community Land Trusts Managing State Trust Lands Regional Collaboration Resolving Land Use Disputes Teaching Fiscal Dimensions of Planning
Land and Property Values in the U.S. Significant Features of the Property Tax University Real Estate Development

Regional Collaboration Stewardship Across Boundaries

Regional Collaboration Home
Problem/Responses
Principles
Tools
Case Examples
Resources
In partnership with the
Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy

Problem/Responses

Problem

The territory of many land use, natural resource, and environmental issues—such as climate change, land use, water use and allocation, and landscape conservation—transcends the legal and geographic reach of existing jurisdictions and institutions.

The people affected by such issues have interdependent interests—none of them has sufficient power or authority to address the issues on their own.

Given that no single entity has the power or authority to address these types of trans-boundary issues, there is a gap in governance, and thus a need to create ways to work across boundaries.

Responses

Practical experience reveals that there is a continuum of responses to bridge the gap in governance created by trans-boundary issues.

The following chart illustrates that regional efforts take many forms—from informal networks, to more formal partnerships, to regional institutions.

These responses are presented as a continuum because the differences among the various approaches are often subtle, and the attributes of one approach often overlap with the next. This continuum also suggests that regional efforts follow a somewhat natural progression from informal to more formal responses as a constituency for regional thinking and action grows.


Home|About|News & Events|Education & Research|Publications & Multimedia|Resources & Tools|Contact|Privacy

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy|113 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-3400 USA

© 2009 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy