At Lincoln House Pressroom / Information Center Contact Calendar My Profile Help Log In
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Quick Links  
At Lincoln House Weblog Find an Expert Latest Policy Focus Report Online Education University Real Estate Database Regional Collaboration
go advanced
search
International Studies Valuation & Taxation Planning & Urban Form

About News & Events Education & Research Publications & Multimedia Resources & Tools
Search Publications and Multimedia Shifting Ground Radio Series Making Sense of Place Film Series Publications Catalog 2009-2010 Program

Search All Publications and Multimedia

> More search options





Publication Dates
FROM:

TO:


> Fewer search options

Can Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Reverse Urban Decline? (Working Paper)

Author(s): Weber, Rachel
Publication Date: June 2003

17 pages; Inventory ID WP03RW1; English

Can Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Reverse Urban Decline? 186 KB

Abstract

To counteract physical decline, local governments have increasingly relied on a redevelopment tool called Tax Increment Financing (TIF). TIF allows municipalities to designate an area for improvement and then earmark any future growth in tax revenues from the area to pay for any economic development expenditures made there. The use of TIF is controversial primarily because of differing perceptions about its impact on property values. If TIF is responsible for property value increases, this tool may be a relatively inexpensive way to increase local wealth and grow the tax base, reduce property abandonment, and make inner city areas more attractive to private investors. If it is not, then this mechanism becomes a way of channeling resources away from the other functions of local government (such as public education) to subsidize development that might have taken place without its use. After describing the mechanics of TIF, the author explains why municipal use of incentives like TIF would or would not raise property values independent of other changes taking place within local land markets. She discusses research that provides empirical evidence to support both sides of the debate and suggests policy reforms that could encourage its more effective use in practice.

Home|About|News & Events|Education & Research|Publications & Multimedia|Resources & Tools|Contact|Privacy

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy|113 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-3400 USA

© 2009 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy