• At Lincoln House Blog
  • Pressroom / Information Center
  • Calendar
  • Register
  • Login
  • Shopping Cart
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  • Quick Links
    • At Lincoln House Blog
    • Find an Expert
    • Latest Policy Focus Report
    • Online Education
    • Lectures & Videos
    • Resources & Tools
  • Departments & Programs
    • Planning and Urban Form
    • Valuation and Taxation
    • International Studies
    • China Program
    • Latin America Program

Español | 中文

  • About
  • News & Events
  • Education & Research
  • Publications & Multimedia
    • 2012-2013 Program
    • Publications Catalog
    • Making Sense of Place Film Series
    • Shifting Ground Radio Series
    • Search Publications and Multimedia
  • Resources & Tools

Search All Publications and Multimedia

> More search options





Publication Dates
FROM:

TO:


> Fewer search options

Capturing Economic Rents to Pay for Conservation of Sensitive Sites (Conference Paper)

Author(s): Dixon, John A.
Publication Date: May 2011

19 pages; Inventory ID CP217-7-12; English

availability free downloadsFREE DOWNLOADS BELOW
Capturing-Economic-Rents-to-Pay-for-Conservation-of-Sensitive-Sites PDF 2.83 MB

This paper appears as a chapter in the volume Climate Change and Land Policies.  Use of this paper should include the following citation: Dixon, John A.. 2011. "Capturing Economic Rents to Pay for Conservation of Sensitive Sites". Climate Change and Land Policies, eds. Ingram, Gregory K. and Yu-Hung Hong. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Abstract

In this paper, John A. Dixon discusses a type of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) system that he calls Direct Rent Capture (DRC). He argues that the reason for the lack of funding to conserve ecologically and culturally sensitive sites such as tropical rain forests, coral reefs, upland watersheds, landscapes, and cultural monuments is the disconnection between providers and users of environmental services. DRC, often in the form of admission or user fees, creates a direct link between the two parties by acknowledging environmental services as national assets and also recognizing the ability of consumers to pay for these services. Setting rules for making these services sustainable in the long run is a key component of these systems.

To illustrate how the DRC approach works, Dixon examines six cases, including Hanauma Bay in Hawaii, Bonaire Marine Park in the Caribbean, Galapagos National Park in Ecuador, Petra in Jordan, myriad sites in Egypt, and a landscape management system in Bhutan. In these cases, entrance fees and charges are used to raise revenues for maintaining the ecological and cultural services over time. DRC also helps users and providers to recognize the value and vulnerability of the services, thereby forging a partnership among government, civil society, and private groups to preserve these resources.

Dixon cautions that DRC may not work in situations where property rights to the natural resources are not well-defined. The implementation of such a system also requires some familiarity with market mechanisms and tourism. He reports that underpricing of services is common. The idea of raising prices to prevent excess demand often engenders political or social opposition, thereby rendering the approach to address overcrowding ineffective. Other rationing approaches, such as restrictions on the number of visitors, parking spaces, or licensed tourist companies, also are needed.

This paper was presented at the Lincoln Institute’s annual Land Policy Conference in 2010, along with numerous other papers on climate change and its impacts on land policy. It is included as chapter 12 in the book Climate Change and Land Policies.

Climate Change and Land Policies
© 2013 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 113 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-3400 USA Home Contact Help Privacy